Italy
Italy launched its first NAP on 15 December 2016. A revised version was launched in November 2018 after a mid-term review.
Italy launched its second NAP on 1 December 2021.
Available NAPs
Italy: 1st NAP (2016-2021)
NAP Development Process
Status
The ‘Piano di Azione Nazionale Impresa E Diritti Umani 2016-2021‘ or Italian National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights 2016-2021 was adopted on 15th December 2016.
At the 2018 UN Business and Human Rights Forum, Fabrizio Petri, the President of the Inter-ministerial Committee for Human Rights, announced the release of a revised NAP following a mid-term review.
Process
The NAP drafting process, which began in early 2015, was led by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation and an Inter-Ministerial Committee for Human Rights (CIDU), with support from other ministries, including:
- The Ministry of Economic Development,
- The Ministry of Economy and Finances,
- The Ministry of the Infrastructures and Transports,
- The Ministry of Justice,
- The Interior Ministry,
- The Ministry of Labour and Social Policies,
- The Ministry for the Environment, Land and Sea,
- The Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Policies,
- The National Institute of Statistics, and
- The National School of Administration.
Additionally, two working groups, one comprising institutional representatives of the different ministers and relevant administrations, intergovernmental organizations and UN agencies, and the other comprising non-institutional stakeholders (trade unions, NGOs business representatives and associations), were set up under the direction of CIDU to prepare a preliminary draft of the NAP.
Hearings with other stakeholders were held by CIDU at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to allow the broader participation throughout the process of elaboration and development of the document. CIDU also organized several meetings and events in several Italian cities, from Milan to Naples to Venice, to promote a constructive dialogue around business and human rights with NGOs, representatives of civil society and business. Furthermore, the multi-stakeholder events were planned by seeking and encouraging representation of the most vulnerable groups such as women, children, disabled, LGBTI people, migrants and asylum seekers, and persons belonging to ethnic and religious minorities.
In June 2016, during the course of the drafting process was held a multi-stakeholder event with the participation of Dante Pesce, Member of the UN Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises.
In order to increase public participation and transparency, a draft of the NAP was posted on the CIDU website open for consultations from July 27 to September 10, 2016. This offered civil society at large the opportunity to comment on the contents by sending individual contributions to a dedicated e-mail address created by CIDU. The responses received were published online on the CIDU website.
The government presented the National Baseline Assessment – the Report on businesses and human rights: the Italian case, analysis of the legal framework and of the safeguard policies (in Italian) drafted by the Instituto Superiore Sant’Anna of Pisa and commissioned by the Secretariat of the NCP of OECD Guidelines of the MiSE to the Chamber of Deputies – on November 13, 2013. This action favoured increasing Members of Parliament’s attention towards the UNGPs, while the document itself was treated as a foundational document for multi-stakeholder consultations.
The first official statement of intent to begin developing a National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights was made with the launch of “The Foundations of the Italian Action Plan on UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNPGs)” to the European Commission. This was published officially in March 2014 and “sets priorities to protect and promote human rights within the UN and EU systems, to strengthen the relationship between business and human rights and to raise awareness of Italian companies in line with UNGPs in the global value chains perspective.” Following this paper, Italy has undertaken the drafting of a NAP on business and human rights (…). The development and implementation of such NAP is fully in line with Action 18 on “Advancing on Business and Human Rights” of the EU Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy 2015- 2019, adopted by the Council of the European Union in July 2015.” [NAP, page 6].
The Italian NAP was officially released on December 15, 2016 and presented on the same day at a conference held by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.
The NAP foresees that it will be implemented in line with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the UN Agenda 2030. This demonstrates a multi-disciplinary and wider approach of the Italian Government that is similarly found in the National Strategy on Sustainable Development adopted by the Ministry of Environment. Additionally, among the National Strategic Objectives, the document recalls the promotion of CSR and of sustainable management of natural resources. The Italian Government also recognizes in the NAP, the strong interconnection between business and human rights issues and corporate social responsibility, yet clarifies that the two policy areas are the object of two different National Action Plans.
Stakeholder Participation
According to information provided in the NAP, civil society and many other actors had an opportunity to contribute individually.
Stakeholders were members of the two working groups that were set up under the direction of CIDU to prepare a preliminary draft of the NAP.
Hearings with other stakeholders were also held by CIDU at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to allow the broader participation throughout the process of elaborating and developing the document.
CIDU also organised several meetings and events in Italy to promote constructive dialogue around business and human rights with NGOs, representatives of civil society and business.
Transparency
In order to increase public participation and transparency, a draft of the National Action Plan was posted on the CIDU website from July 27 to September 10, 2016. This posting received many contributions and inputs from CSOs, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), as well as business associations, trade unions and companies. Contributions could be submitted by email.
On March 13, 2017, the first Workshop focused on NAP implementation was held in Rome. It was coordinated by the CIDU in collaboration with AsVis (Italian Alliance for Sustainable Development). However, the event did not clarify the timeline for implementation of the measures contained in the NAP, nor the role played by the Working Group on Business and Human Rights (GLIDU), a monitoring body, as provided for in the NAP.
National Baseline Assessment (NBA)
The National Baseline Assement (NBA) – the Report on businesses and human rights: the Italian case, analysis of the legal framework and of the safeguard policies (in Italian) – was conducted by the Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna. The NBA was commissioned by the Secretariat of the NCP of OECD Guidelines and hosted by the Ministry of Economic Development. The methodology was developed by researchers of the Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna.
The structure of the document, conceived mainly for ministerial officials and industry experts, provides that each of the selected themes is the subject of a dedicated section. The sections are based on a composite search that included direct examination of legal policies and instruments, analysis of specific ministerial contributions, research in specialist publications, and interviews with experts in various disciplinary fields.
The sections are structured as follows: (1) text of the relevant Guiding Principles; (2) analysis of the relevant regulatory instruments and institutional practices at international and European level; (3) national regulatory instruments and practices; (4) assessment of compliance of national instruments and practices with the Guiding Principles; (5) specific recommendations on the steps to be taken in order to ensure compliance of national regulatory instruments and institutional practices with the Guiding Principles (and with other relevant international standards).
Additionally, the NAP states that gap analysis of the UNGPs was based both on the NBA and on the Study of University of Sant’Anna.
Follow-up, monitoring, reporting and review
The National Action Plan for 2016-2021 on Business and Human Rights will be periodically monitored and reviewed through a process of analysis and consultation with all relevant stakeholders.
To ensure implementation of the present NAP, the GLIDU is established within the CIDU and is composed of all the administrations represented in the CIDU. The GLIDU will have the task of supervising the progressive implementation of the NAP and coordinating the monitoring activities. It will also be responsible for proposing modifications and/or revisions of the measures foreseen in the Plan on the basis of either the necessity to fine tune future governmental policies or new necessities and thematic priorities that will emerge in the meetings and multi-stakeholder initiatives related to the implementation of the Plan itself.
With the aim of guaranteeing a multi-stakeholder approach, the GLIDU will work jointly with a consultative body composed of all relevant non-institutional stakeholders (business community, trade unions, NGOs, civil society organizations, human rights defenders, individual experts and representatives from academia).
In 2018, the GLIDU conducted a mid-term review to assess the results achieved and identify gaps in the actions undertaken to ensure the effective protection and advancement of human rights with regard to economic activities. The analysis was carried out with a special focus on the priorities set in the present NAP and with the aim of addressing future challenges. Following the mid-term review, Fabrizio Petri, the President of the Inter-ministerial Committee for Human Rights, announced the release of a revised NAP in November 2018 at the Annual UN Business and Human Rights Forum, which included some limited additional language around journalists and human rights defenders.
Stakeholders views and analysis on the NAP
Shift Project: Shift Submission to Public Consultation on Italian National Action Plan, September, 2016
European Coalition for Corporate Justice: Switzerland, Italy, Germany and the US release Business and Human Rights National Action Plans
HRIC, ECCJ, MANI TESE, FIDH: Contribution to the Italian National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights 2016-2021; 2017
Marta Bordignon, Giacomo Maria Cremenesi: Contribution to the Italian Action Plan on Business and Human Rights; The UNGPs Third Pillar in the Italian Action Plan; an assessment of the existing NAPs and the barriers to the Italian judicial system;
2016
Contributions submitted as part of the online consultations:
- Amnesty International Italy
- AVSI
- Bulgari
- Citizen
- Confindustria
- CIDSE
- Sodalitas Foundation
- HRIC-ECCJ-FIDH-MT
- IRISS-CNR
- Maritain Institute
- Cossano Lajolo
- PBI Italy
- Shift
- Spes contra Spem
- UGL
- Unions
- Unions bis.
Explore NAP by Issue
Italy 2nd NAP (2021-2026)
NAP Development Process
Status
On 1 December 2021, the Comitato Interministeriale per i Diritti Umani (CIDU) launched the ‘Secondo Piano d’Azione Nazionale su Impresa e Diritti Umani (2021-2026)’ or ‘Second National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights 2021-2026’. The new plan emerged as a follow-up of the first Italian NAP (2016-2021) after a final stocktaking exercise with multiple stakeholders. The stakeholder contributions are available here (in Italian).
The first NAP is availlable in English and Italian. Additional information about the first NAP (2016-2021) is available here.
Process
The second NAP was drafted after consultations by the Working Group on Business and Human Rights (GLIDU), previously set up by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation and Inter-Ministerial Committee for Human Rights (CIDU) in the framework of the first NAP. GLIDU is a theme-specific inter-ministerial body comprising experts on business and human rights. According to the second NAP (p. 10), GLIDU convenes on two sessions a year over which they deliberate on the implementation of the NAP and revision efforts. In 2018, GLIDU had decided on a mid-term revision of the first NAP, which is available online in Italian and English.
In April 2021, GLIDU opened an online public consultation on the CIDU website. This consultation consisted of a questionnaire with pre-determined questions. GLIDU received feedback from several stakeholder groups on the implementation of the first NAP (2016-2021) and recommendations for drafting the Second NAP. The following stakeholders offered their input on this first round of consultations (with links to their contributions, in Italian only):
- ActionAid Italia
- AVSI
- Confindustria
- FAIR – Campagna Abiti Puliti
- FOCSIV
- Fondazione Global Compact Network Italia
- Fondazione Pangea Onlus
- Human Rights International Corner ETS (HRIC)
- IRISS-CNR
- MANI TESE
- OXFAM Italia
- Save the children Italia
- The Good Lobby Italia
A summary of the consultations was published as Annex V to the second NAP.
Following a stocktaking exercise of the April consultations, GLIDU drafted and released a preliminary version of the second NAP (no longer available online) and opened a second public consultation. This consultation was open during September-October 2021 and the following stakeholders group offered their comments on the draft of the second NAP (in Italian):
- ActionAid
- AVSI
- AICS
- Confindustria
- FAIR – Abiti Puliti
- FOCSIV
- AGID IGF ITALIA
- HRIC
- CGIL CISL UIL
- OIM
- Rete In difesa di
- WeWorldOnlus
The second NAP also mentions GLIDU’s efforts in convening “open sessions for listening and debating” with relevant stakeholders in the development of the second NAP (p. 60).
From September 27 to October 6, 2021, the UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights (UNWG) made a working visit to Italy. In its report, the UNWG recognized the efforts to create a Second National Action Plan. The issues raised by the UNWG were raised and addressed in the second NAP.
Stakeholder Participation
A group of diverse stakeholders participated in the two rounds of consultations for the elaboration of the Second NAP (see above, Process). Hearings with other stakeholders were also held by CIDU at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to allow the broader participation throughout the process of elaborating and developing the document. CIDU also organized several meetings and events in Italy to promote constructive dialogue around business and human rights with NGOs, representatives of civil society and business.
Transparency
In order to increase public participation and transparency, a draft of the National Action Plan was posted on the CIDU website during September and October 2021 (no longer available). This posting received many contributions and inputs from CSOs, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), as well as business associations, trade unions and companies. Contributions could be submitted by email.
National Baseline Assessment (NBA)
• Published in 2013 and available here.
• Commissioned by the State (the OECD NCP and Ministry of Economic Development) to inform the development of an inaugural BHR NAP, which was published in December 2016.
• Conducted by academics from the University of Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna.
• Follows its own methodology based on desktop research and stakeholder interviews. Contains recommendations.
No National Baseline Assessment (NBA) was commissioned for the development of the second NAP.
Follow-up, monitoring, reporting and review
The NAP states that:
“The National Action Plan for 2021-2026 on Business and Human Rights will be periodically monitored and reviewed through a process of analysis and consultation with all relevant stakeholders.
To ensure implementation of the present NAP, the GLIDU will continue to have the task of supervising the progressive implementation of the NAP and coordinating the monitoring activities. It will also be responsible for proposing modifications and/or revisions of the measures foreseen in the Plan on the basis of either the necessity to fine tune future governmental policies or new necessities and thematic priorities that will emerge in the meetings and multi-stakeholder initiatives related to the implementation of the Plan itself.
With the aim of guaranteeing a multi-stakeholder approach, the GLIDU will work jointly with a consultative body composed of all relevant non-institutional stakeholders (business community, trade unions, NGOs, civil society organizations, human rights defenders, individual experts and representatives from academia).”
The second Italian NAP further states that Italy will “[c]arry out an open and constructive dialogue with States for the exchange of knowledge and good practices regarding voluntary review models of National Action Plans on Business and Human Rights, including through peer review mechanisms.”
Stakeholders views and analysis on the NAP
- United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights, Statement at the end of visit to Italy by the United Nations Working Group on Business and Human Rights, 2021.
- Contributions submitted as part of the online consultations:
Additional resources
- Italian National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights 2021-2026
- Business & Human Rights Resource Centre: Government survey results – Italy
Explore NAP by Issue
“The second Italian NAP-BHR intends to strengthen the application of the UNGPs through a series of complementary measures, referring in particular to the following guidelines: – the commitment to update and improve collective action in relation to multiple human rights issues from the perspective of protecting the ‘most vulnerable’ (women and girls, minors, persons with disabilities, LGBTIQ+ persons, migrants and asylum seekers, persons belonging to ethnic and religious minorities, the elderly), with the aim to empower their role and involvement as right-holders, where individual aspects related to business activities may have a significant impact on these categories from a labour and economic point of view.” (p. 7) “The NAP (…) introduces limited objectives and actions, with reference to the national context translated into the following priorities: 2. The fight against caporalato (especially in the agricultural and construction sectors) and forms of exploitation, forced labour, child labour, slavery and irregular work, with particular attention to migrants and victims of trafficking” (p. 10) “In particular, the new Plan will be based on the following key priorities: (…) (f) strengthen efforts to prevent child trafficking for multiple exploitation purposes (…) (i) continue to take measures to ensure that the return of trafficked persons is carried out with respect for their rights, safety and dignity and, with regard to children, in full compliance with the principle of the best interests of the child” (p. 24) “for a targeted sectoral intervention concerning vulnerable categories, it is important to enhance wider knowledge in the business world about some guidelines adopted in this field: the Guidelines on Childhood and Adolescence, recently revised, the Cooperation Guidelines on Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, Girls and Children (2020-2024)” (p. 25) “The Italian Government supports public and private sector initiatives to promote attention, inclusion and protection of children’s and adolescents’ rights in business practices with the aim of integrating them into all aspects of the value chain – from investment practices, supplier relations, marketing, end-product safety, data protection 41 and privacy protection, to the impact of business activities on communities, market and the environment. Mention should be made, in this regard, of UNICEF commitment which, starting from the “Children’s Rights & Business Principles”, has developed and promoted a series of materials addressed to both Governments and businesses to integrate the protection of children’s rights in business practices. In this context, Italy recalls the relevant contents introduced in the European Union Strategy on the Rights of the Child adopted by the EU Commission on 24 March 2021 and, more specifically, renews its commitment inherent in Sustainable Development Goal 8.7 of the 2030 Agenda to end child labour, in all its forms, by 2025. Italy also promotes “family friendly policies”, as national and corporate policies aimed at supporting workers in their role as parents/caregivers. On this issue, UNICEF has formulated some important indications on the best ways Governments and the private sector can build “family friendly” policies: – encouraging employers to introduce gender-sensitive and inclusive paid leave entitlements, flexible working arrangements and childcare support systems; – the introduction of paid parental, maternity and paternity paid leave in the early-birth period and for the first year of a child’s life; fair and gender-sensitive parental leave to ensure that no parent is overburdened by family care; leave available to all, both for fulltime employees and those working part-time or under non-standard contractual arrangements; and financial coverage linked to birth care; – childcare services made accessible by the end of parental leave, so that there is no gap in available support; – quality childcare services, made accessible, flexible and affordable, available to all children, regardless of family circumstances; – alignment of childcare services with other family support policies, such as universal family allowances, to reduce the risk of existing inequalities in access to public childcare facilities.” (p. 40) “7. Fully implement the provisions contained in the new legislation on Development Cooperation, with particular focus on the relationship between for-profit and not-for-profit actors and promote the widest knowledge among companies of the Guidelines on Childhood and Adolescence, the Cooperation Guidelines on Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, Girls and Children (2020-2024) and the Guidelines on Disability and Social Inclusion in Cooperation Interventions” (p. 62) “21. Reaffirm as a priority the elimination of all forms of exploitation of child labour in Italy and with reference to the economic activities of Italian companies abroad, as provided for by the relevant ILO Conventions; to this end, encourage the dissemination among companies of initiatives aimed at increasing attention on impacts of business activities on children’s rights and on the need for the inclusion of adequate remedies and mitigation measures as per the risk of violation of such rights. The inclusion of children’s rights in business practices includes: the provision of “family friendly policies” designed to support workers in their role as parents/caregivers (smart working, paid parental leave, social protection and adequate wages for all); the introduction of measures to monitor the presence of minors in the workplace; the adoption of Child Safeguarding Policies/Codes of Conduct to foresee, report and take charge of potential risk situations for minors who come into contact with the company; the provision of security guarantees for digital environment (data protection, access to age-appropriate content, privacy protection).” (p. 64) “So far the second NAP-BHR also incorporates the recommendations received during the third cycle of the Universal Periodic Review, relating to efforts – in terms of policies, legislative and administrative measures – to prevent and manage the obvious risk of companies’ involvement in human rights violations in conflict situations, and to support companies in better implementing legislative measures to combat labour exploitation in the agricultural sector” (p.8) “In this area it is important to mention: – the implementation of the Regulation (EU) 2017/821 on “conflict minerals”: the Regulation entered into force on 1 January 2021 and Legislative Decree No. 13 of 2 February 2021 provides for its adequate domestic implementation”” (p. 12) “At the European level, the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 establishing supply chain Due Diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, minerals and gold, originating in conflict or high-risk areas, has recently led EU Member States to take action to adapt their legal and regulatory systems to introduce this new obligation for Union importers” (p. 44) “Italy acknowledges an enhanced attention to the respect of human rights in areas affected by armed conflict, where their promotion can be an essential tool to prevent conflict and rebuild more stable and peaceful societies. On this basis, and with specific reference to minerals from areas affected by conflict or at high risk – in particular in the gold sector – Italy has performed best practices through awareness campaigns and training activities in line with the OECD Guidelines on Due Diligence, as well as the relevant EU regulations. In addition, again with reference to responsible trade in minerals, Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council was adopted in 2017. This established supply chain Due Diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold, originating in conflict or high-risk zones. It has been transposed into Italian law through Legislative Decree No. 13 of 2 February 2021, which establishes Due Diligence obligations in the supply chain for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold, originating in conflict or high-risk areas.” (p. 52) “37. Fully implement Regulation (EU) 2017/821 establishing supply chain Due Diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold, originating in conflict or high-risk areas. 38. Further promote awareness of the OECD Guides on Due Diligence for Companies Operating in Weak Governance Zones (the “Risk Awareness Tool for Multinational Companies in Weak Governance Zones” and the “Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas”). 39. Include respect for human rights by businesses through specific projects designed and developed through the Italian Agency for Development Cooperation in areas of armed conflict (or high risk) that include awareness raising and capacity-development activities. 40. Strengthen the action of the Italian Cooperation on gender equality, including through support to the economic development of women in post-conflict situations in line with the three UN Pillars (peace and security, development and human rights) and in the context of the legislative and programmatic framework of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 “Women, Peace and Security” and Fourth National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security adopted by Italy in 2020.” (p. 67) “2. What are the good practices adopted by stakeholders, in line with the measures of the first NAP BHR? Two further relevant aspects also emerged: typical conditions of countries at high risk, depending on the introduction of strict contractual clauses for trade transactions in such contexts – also in line with Regulation (EU) 2017/821 on minerals from “conflict or high risk areas”; the obligation of Due Diligence in relation to the import of minerals.” (p. 70) “The NAP (…) introduces limited objectives and actions, with reference to the national context translated into the following priorities: The fight against caporalato (especially in the agricultural and construction sectors) and forms of exploitation, forced labour, child labour, slavery and irregular work, with particular attention to migrants and victims of trafficking” (p. 10) “6. Strengthening of legislative and policy measures relating to the prevention an combating of the phenomenon of ‘caporalato’ (especially in the agricultural and construction sectors).” (p. 11) “14. Update the information on the current legislative framework to combat illegal work and labour exploitation in the agricultural, construction, manufacturing and service sectors.” (p. 63) “The legality rating is an indicator of compliance with high standards of legality by companies. It is a tool introduced into Italian law by Decree Law No. 29 of 24 March 2012 in order to promote principles of ethical behavior in the business environment through the assignment of a recognition, measured in “stars”. These are indicative of the respect for legality by companies that have requested it and, more generally, the degree of attention paid to the proper management of their business. The rating is linked by law to advantages in the granting of public loans and facilities for access to bank credit.” (p. 16) “Finally, in its Resolution of 10 March 2021, the European Parliament addressed to the Commission recommendations concerning Due Diligence and Corporate Responsibility for a future directive, which would contribute to preventing and mitigating potential or actual negative impacts of business action on human rights, the environment and good governance.” (p. 44) “Furthermore to enhance the tool, a targeted collaboration between the Antitrust Authority and the National Anti-Corruption Authority has made it possible to increase the guarantee of the level of protection of human rights by businesses by configuring an additional tool of the business rating. With respect to this tool, ruled between June and August 2020, more than 200,000 applications were submitted by Italian businesses for recognition of the standard.” (p. 17) “In addition, ANAC is working with other stakeholders in the project “Measuring the risk of corruption at territorial level and promoting transparency” (funded by the National Operational Programme Governance and Institutional Capacity 2014-2020 – ERDF, ASSE 3 – Specific Objective 3.1 Action 3.1.4), to identify quantitative indicators of the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures implemented by the administrations (so-called contrast indicators). The project also intends to create inter-institutional collaboration networks to 50 guarantee transparency in every sector of the Public Administration. The intent is to raise awareness of the private sector, academia and civil society on the need to overcome the current approach, based on exclusively subjective corruption indicators, and to promote a further approach to measuring corruption, based on reliable data in line with the principle of “leading by example”. As suggested by the OECD “investing in improving data quality to enhance risk assessments can provide a context for organizations to address broader issues along the value chain, improving the use of data within decision-making processes” (OECD, 2019).” (p. 49) “The Italian legal framework on anti-corruption has been strengthened by Law No. 3/2019 (“Measures to combat crimes against the public administration, as well as on prescription and transparency of political parties and movements”), which consolidates a process regulated by Law No. 190/2012 and Law No. 69/2015 (strengthening the anti-corruption system). This most recent legislative measure is an important step towards a more comprehensive anti-corruption regime, in particular with regard to the fight against corruption in the public sector. Its main features are as follows: – the law introduces a dual approach: it strengthens the prosecution and (criminal) sanctioning of the act of corruption as well as the (administrative) prevention of the act itself in the public and private sector; – it encourages coordination between the public institutions involved; – it promotes a multi-stakeholder approach, calling on the private sector to play an active role in preventing corruption; – it demonstrates the relevance of the impact of multilateral conventions, recommendations and standards developed in the relevant forums (G20, OECD, Council of Europe), against which there is now an important alignment of the national anti-corruption system. In Italy Whistleblowing was introduced by the anti-corruption law (Law No. 190 of 6 November 2012, “Provisions for the prevention and repression of corruption and illegality in public administration”), adopted in compliance with recommendations and conventional obligations emanating from the UN, OECD, Council of Europe and European Union. This law provides for a system of enhanced protection for public employees who report unlawful conducts. Law No. 179 of 30 November 2017 strengthened the pre-existing whistleblower protection for public employees and partially extended the same protection to the private sector. With regard to the public sector, the law provides that a public employee who reports illegal or unethical conduct in the public interest cannot be retaliated against through sanctions, dismissal, demotion, transfer to other offices or other measures that have a negative effect on his/her working conditions. The protection is guaranteed to: employees of public administrations; employees of public economic entities; employees of private law entities subject to public control; employees and collaborators of private companies that provide goods, works or services to the public administration. Employees can report a violation : – to the person responsible for the prevention of corruption and transparency, – the National Anti-Corruption Authority (ANAC), and – to the judicial or accounting authority. The law covers misconduct and ethical errors, including (but not limited to): criminal conduct; violations of codes of conduct; mismanagement of public resources; nepotism; 51 accounting irregularities; violations of environmental and occupational safety regulations, etc. The protection entails, albeit within certain limits, the confidentiality of the whistleblower’s identity. The main protection mechanisms also include: the reversal of the burden of proof on retaliation on the administration, the reinstatement of the employee whose dismissal has been found to be retaliatory, and a financial penalty against the author of the retaliatory act or conduct ranging from € 5,000 to €30,000 imposed by ANAC. A desk service is available to whistleblowers who report cases of unlawful conduct in their workplace. The reports are acquired through a dedicated software, which guarantees confidentiality, security and reliability of whistleblowers. ANAC has made the computer application used for the acquisition and management of reports of wrongdoing by employees (“Whistleblower” software) available for re-use by administrations and companies with a European Union Public License (EUPL), which allows free use without further authorization from ANAC. Focusing on the private sector, the law provides some mandatory whistleblowing requirements for those companies that have chosen (or choose) to implement a “231 Model”. In particular, companies must provide communication channels that allow the submission of reports based on precise and factual elements connected with crimes as listed in Legislative Decree No. 231/2001. These communication channels must guarantee the confidentiality of the whistleblower in the management of the report; in addition, at least one alternative reporting channel must be provided which guarantees – using ad hoc software – the confidentiality of the whistleblower’s identity; the 231 model must also prohibit acts of retaliation, direct or indirect discriminatory actions against the whistleblower for reasons connected to the report/alert. Sanctions must be introduced in the disciplinary system adopted with the 231 model, both for those who violate the whistleblower protection measures and for the whistleblowers themselves who make malicious or seriously negligent reports that turn out to be unfounded; discriminatory measures may be reported to the Labour Inspectorate and to the competent trade union organizations. In addition, discriminatory dismissals, job changes and any discriminatory measures taken against the whistleblower will be void unless the company can demonstrate that they are in no way related to the whistleblowing activity. EU Directive 2019/1937, which regulates the “protection of persons who report breaches of Union law”, is currently being transposed in Italy, introducing common rules aimed at ensuring the protection of employees who report wrongdoing or breaches (“Whistleblowers”) in the Member States’ legal systems. It should be noted that some large Italian companies, announcing a policy of “zero tolerance” towards fraud and corruption, have been pioneers in this field, having created protected channels of reporting with a guarantee of anonymity even before the entry into force of the above-mentioned law. With the support of Transparency International – Italy, they have recently voluntarily adopted an online whistleblowing platform that is more advanced than the tools currently in use and that conforms to the highest standards of confidentiality” (p. 50) “Formal adherence to the principles of the UN Global Compact such as those relating to respect for human rights, workers, environmental protection and the fight against corruption, is a necessary requirement not only for sustainable economic growth, but also for the affirmation of democratic and participatory principles and the elimination of discrimination and inequality” (p. 55) “35. continuing the promotion and protection of human rights, with a proactive role of the Inter-ministerial Committee for Human Rights, in correlation with the priority lines introduced in the framework of the PNRR and the SNSVS, including – among others – issues such as anticorruption, non-financial information disclosure , supply chain, environmental issues, decent work and non-discrimination in favour of competing companies in public calls for tender and within contracts stipulated with companies for the purchase of goods and services, with particular regard to (i) Italian companies operating abroad; (ii) Italian companies using foreign suppliers; (iii) foreign companies” (p. 66) “The Italian Government supports public and private sector initiatives to promote attention, inclusion and protection of children’s and adolescents’ rights in business practices with the aim of integrating them into all aspects of the value chain – from investment practices, supplier relations, marketing, end-product safety, data protection 41 and privacy protection, to the impact of business activities on communities, market and the environment” (p. 40) “21. (…) The inclusion of children’s rights in business practices includes: the provision of “family friendly policies” designed to support workers in their role as parents/caregivers (smart working, paid parental leave, social protection and adequate wages for all); the introduction of measures to monitor the presence of minors in the workplace; the adoption of Child Safeguarding Policies/Codes of Conduct to foresee, report and take charge of potential risk situations for minors who come into contact with the company; the provision of security guarantees for digital environment (data protection, access to age-appropriate content, privacy protection).” (p. 64) “For Italy international development cooperation is “an integral and qualifying part of foreign policy”, as provided by Law No. 125/14. It contributes to the promotion of peace and justice and aims to foster solidarity and equal relations between peoples based on the principles of interdependence and partnership in respect of human rights. Political responsibility for development cooperation rests with the Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, which establishes its guidelines and ensures the unity and coordination of all national cooperation initiatives. The Italian Agency for Development Cooperation, under the direction and supervision of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of International Cooperation, has the task of implementing cooperation policies. The coherence of national policies is ensured through the Interministerial Committee on Development Cooperation (CICS) , chaired by the President of the Council of Ministers and composed of representatives of the main Ministries. Law No. 125/14 also provided for the establishment of a National Council for Development Cooperation, whose members include the main public and private actors, civil society organizations and other nonprofit and for-profit entities operating in the field of international development cooperation. Finally, for a targeted sectoral intervention concerning vulnerable categories, it is important to enhance wider knowledge in the business world about some guidelines adopted in this field: the Guidelines on Childhood and Adolescence, recently revised, the Cooperation Guidelines on Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, Girls and Children (2020-2024) and the Guidelines on Disability and Social Inclusion in Cooperation Interventions (2018); the latter one has established relevant targets: increasing the awareness of companies to improve the employment of persons with disabilities; fostering employment through training activities using new information technologies” (p. 25) “41. Confirm Italy’s commitment to microfinance initiatives that favour and support local entrepreneurship in development cooperation partner countries.” (p. 67) “(…) the second Italian NAP-BHR intends to strengthen the application of the UNGPs through a series of complementary measures, referring in particular to the following guidelines: (…) – the need to study in depth innovative issues related to technological development and artificial intelligence – also in relation to the Declaration of Rights in the Internet adopted by the Italian Parliament on 31 July 2015, in order to highlight their possible impact on the enjoyment of human rights, as well as an adequate action of corporate Due Diligence, and further innovative issues related to activities promoted by cultural companies with an important impact on the promotion of human rights” (p. 7) “4. A collective awareness of the impact that new technologies, especially artificial intelligence, could have on the enjoyment of human rights, while paying attention to the promotion of corporate due diligence processes on human rights within the activities of those companies involved in research and development of new technologies” (p. 11) “Regarding gender leadership issues, the Task Force “Women for a New Renaissance”, established by the Ministry of Equal Opportunities and Family in 2020 to address the impact of Covid-19 on gender issues has produced a Final Report, based on quantitative data and qualitative scientific information on the impact of the pandemic in different sectors. Among the Task Force’s multiple proposals there are those ones targeted to: (…) – overcoming barriers to advancement in career paths, particularly in the fastest growing fields (STEM, computer science, cloud computing, data and artificial intelligence)” (p. 29) “23. Monitor the application of artificial intelligence in the workplace (e.g. recruitment mechanisms) for the purpose of assessing impact on human rights in terms of inclusion and non-discrimination.” (p. 65) “48. Disseminate principles adopted in relation to emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence for human rights compliance with a Due Diligence approach.” (p. 68) “With regard to Italy and taking into consideration the goals set for 2030, the adequacy of the effort to be put in place for de-carbonisation can only be assessed starting within the framework of the current Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan. This is a planning tool provided for by Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 on the EU Energy Governance adopted after assessment by all stakeholders, both institutional and private, and which represents the country’s commitment and contribution for the implementation of the so-called “Climate and Energy Package”. An important accelerating factor for the strengthening and implementation of the measures identified in the PNIEC is the new National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR), which gives the ecological transition a driving role in the relaunch of the country’s system. It assigns an important share of resources also for investments in sustainable mobility, renewable sources and energy efficiency, with a proper reference in mission n. 2 of the PNRR – “Green revolution and ecological transition”. Further expanding the horizon to 2050, Italy has outlined its engagement path towards “climate neutrality” with a National Long-Term Strategy (LTS), also provided for in the aforementioned EU Energy Governance Regulation (EU) 2018/1999. The Strategy incorporates virtuous energy-environmental trends triggered by the PNIEC from now until 2030 and identifies key levers to bring the Country to “zero net emissions.” It consists mainly of energy savings, mix of energy sources and new technologies to be developed in the short to medium term. Being the PNIEC integrated in the PNRR, the transition from traditional fuels to renewable sources should be accelerated abandoning coal in favour of an increasingly renewable-based electricity mix with a residual and complementary rate of natural gas (and an increasing contribution of renewable gases: biomethane, hydrogen and synthetic methane).” (p. 39) “The second Italian NAP-BHR intends to strengthen the application of the UNGPs through a series of complementary measures, referring in particular to the following guidelines: – addressing issues and practices related to the protection of the environment, health, decent work and ‘Human Rights Defenders’, also in the face of the new challenges posed by the gig economy and in the context of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), in correlation with the challenges of multi-dimensional post-Covid-19 reconstruction” (p. 7) “The evolutionary reading of BHR issues has taken on an innovative connotation also in the European context: the Commission has proposed a series of important legislative initiatives on aspects such as sustainable corporate governance and related reporting methods, development cooperation, trade dynamics, sustainable finance, labour and environmental dimensions, analysis of the impact of business activities in environmental, social and governance terms, with a view to achieving the SDGs and implementing the multi-actor and multi-dimensional commitments introduced in the 2030 Agenda.” (p. 9) “The NAP addresses the issue of the negative impact of business activities on human rights and identifies specific commitments with the aim of effectively integrating the UNGPs into the national system and business activities” and introduces limited objectives and actions, with reference to the national context translated into the following priorities: 6. The promotion of environmental protection and sustainability.” “The promotion of protection of the ecosystem and environmental sustainability processes, taking into consideration the impact of business companies’ actions on peoples and communities in the medium and long term.” “The renewed and dynamic entrepreneurial approach is based on corporate governance structures to overcoming short-term financial advantages for environmental, social and human sustainability in the medium and long term in the context of the European Union’s initiatives on the circular economy, biodiversity and sustainable financial growth.” (p. 12) “pursue an organizational and reform process in the decontamination sector, acting on both administrative and operational functions in collaboration with regional bodies, to renew and make the system more efficient, combating environmental damage” (p. 15) “Promoting a system of farms that is economically, socially and environmentally sustainable is essential to ensure product quality and decent working conditions, as well as to enhance the economic potential of companies and promote growth and welfare in different territories.” (p. 20) Italy, with regard to the Initiative undertaken in December 2019 by the new EU Commission for a Green Deal that aims by 2050 to a climate-neutral Europe, has established a fund for public investment (€ 4.24 billion for years from 2020 to 2023). It is intended to support innovative investment projects and programmes with a high level of environmental sustainability, which will be used to support investments in relation to circular economy, as well as in de-carbonisation, urban regeneration, sustainable tourism, adaptation and mitigation of risks from climate change. In this perspective, the redefinition of the ‘Industry 4.0 Plan’ is also fundamental, with greater attention to environmental sustainability for encouraging green investments by companies in circular economy. In the same perspective, further fiscal measures have been foreseen, including incentives for packaging reuse and recycling , purchase of products, through efficiency of production processes and greater awareness, responsibility and collaboration by consumers both in purchase, use and conservation of products. The European regulatory package on circular economy, already implemented by Italy by four separate legislative decrees, establishes a concrete action programme based on an economic model based on production activities and consumption into the cycle to reduce environmental. The circular approach redefines efficient management of inputs and outputs, towards the definition of closed and regenerative cycles with an impact on economic, natural and social capital. In the context of the European Action Plan for the Circular Economy, the Government, through dialogue with local authorities and constant consultation of public and private operators and trade associations – intends to develop technical and administrative tools to ensure the support and development of coherent supply chains according to an approach of economic circularity. The Ministry for Ecological Transition is in charge for monitoring implementation of legislative decrees enforcing the ‘Circular Economy Package’ and preparation of corrective decrees; National Action Plan for the environmental sustainability of consumption in the Public Administration will be defined to maximize green public procurement; further tools for the development of ‘circular’ supply chains will be completed, through the adoption of Minimum Environmental Criteria for new production sectors; decrees concerning waste management will be drafted; the National Waste Prevention Programme will be updated; the waste traceability register will be implemented. In the area of waste, the essential core of a circular economy, important measures have already been adopted and others are planned, according to a precise timetable already outlined. On September 23, 2020, Legislative Decree No. 116, implementing Directive (EU) 2018/851, included in the so-called “circular economy package”, came into force. This Decree introduced, among other things, Art. 198-bis of the Environmental Code, which provides for the adoption of the “National Programme for Waste Management”: in this framework the Ministry for Ecological Transition, in collaboration with ISPRA, will set macro-objectives, criteria and strategic guidelines to be endorsed by Regions and Autonomous Provinces in the preparation of the Regional Waste Management Plans. The Programme intends to pursue, also with the involvement of stakeholders, a greater synergy in the country to address the lack of plants and a remedy to the so-called NIMBY syndrome (“not in my backyard”) that often represents a brake on the achievement of circular economy targets. Another tool, in transposition of EU Directives 851/2018 and 852/2018, is the National Waste Production Prevention Programme (PNPR), provided by Art. 180 of the Environment Code and demanding from Regions – according to Art. 199, paragraph 3, lett. R) – the adoption of Waste Production Prevention Programmes (PRPRs). Finally, in implementation of the EU Directives for the establishment of a national register as a key tool for circular economy, the aforementioned Ministry has started preliminary experimentation, creating a prototype of the National Waste e-Register for waste 36 traceability, to check its functionality and usability and in particular the interoperability with the management systems currently used by companies. In 2021 R.E.N.T.R.I. webpage was published (www.rentri.it), providing for a proper section reserved for the Experimental Laboratory for Functional Prototyping. Since then companies were able to test it. The R.E.N.T.R.I. timetable foresees user accreditation, validation of the authorization through application access to information systems, contextual registers with interoperability on the REN to communicate data on movements noted in the register to the REN. Within environmental management systems for companies, the recognition of the Ecolabel and related adhesion to eco-management and audit (EMAS) is particularly important. The Italian national competent body for applying community schemes is the Committee for the Ecolabel and Ecoaudit, established in 1995 and currently composed of representatives of the Ministries for Ecological Transition, Economic Development, Health and Economy and Finance, with the technical support of ISPRA. Since 2018 the regulation for the promotion of products with high environmental qualification certified by the “Made Green in Italy” (MGI) logo is in force: it is aimed at promoting sustainable models of production and consumption, according to the EU PEF (Product Environmental Footprint) methodology for the determination of environmental footprint of products as defined in EU Commission Recommendation 2013/179/EU. The purpose of the MGI scheme is to direct the initiatives of the Italian production system towards use of environmental footprint as a lever for the improvement and enhancement of Made in Italy products with good environmental performance (guaranteed by a scientifically reliable system). It aims to facilitate the identification of products by consumers so as to encourage more conscious choices. It combines environmental sustainability performance of products, throughout their value chain, with Made in Italy, linked to excellent national production system. It is an institutional certification based on the European PEF methodology, implemented through additional sustainability requirements and more ambitious national environmental quality requirements. In addition, it is the only certification that integrates requirements that ask companies to communicate environmental footprint of products to consumers (ISO14025 type 3 labels), with requirements that allow access to the scheme only for excellent products, better than the average (ISO 14024 type 1 labels). Considerable opportunities are therefore provided for national producers who intend to make use of this new tool, which straddles the line between environmental policy and corporate marketing. In fact, many sectors have expressed interest in the scheme and are hoping for a new call for CPRs. Adherence to the scheme involves two steps: the first concerns the drafting of Product Category Rules-RCP (technical documents containing methodological indications for calculating environmental footprint of a given product category) and the second involves actual adherence to the scheme. Companies conclude the process by receiving a certification by a third party so that they could communicate final results and ensure maximum transparency of the entire process. The “Made Green in Italy” scheme attributes the logo to be attached to products with high environmental qualification and a detailed declaration available through a QR code that provides clear, uniform, complete and transparent information to consumers. With regard to forthcoming measures, calls for CPRs will be launched periodically as well as calls to support companies wishing to join the MGI scheme. The Manual for the Use of the MGI Logo according to the Made Green in Italy Regulation and 12 new CPRs have been published in June 2021 for the following sectors/products: Agri-Food Sector: Grana Padano, Provolone Tutela Valpadana, Vinegar, Dry pasta, Fresh pork meat, Fresh beef meat. Industrial sector: Laundry-Industrial laundry services, Carded wool-textile, Wooden packaging manufacture, Steel, Geotextiles and related products, Raw tobacco. Another relevant policy is the Environmental Footprint Assessment Programme, launched by the Ministry for Ecological Transition in 2010 to measure and improve environmental performance of private and public sectors. It provides for products (goods and services) and organizational certification, and in its experimental phase, among environmental indicators, it has favoured the analysis of the carbon footprint. Indeed it is an environmental driver, closely linked to climate change, and has an added value for the competitiveness of Italian businesses on international markets. Companies that join the programme, after signing a Voluntary Agreement with the Ministry for Ecological Transition, receive a certification by a third party in order to be able to communicate final results in accordance with the communication guidelines of the Programme and guarantee maximum transparency of the whole process. The programme remains operational until the full implementation of the scheme for all production sectors. In relation to environmental sustainability in the Public Administration, a first step in this direction was the “Guide for the integration of social aspects in public procurement”, adopted by the aforementioned Ministry by Ministerial Decree of June 6, 2012, as part of the National Action Plan on Green Public Procurement (PANGPP), i.e. through socially responsible public procurement, public authorities can not only promote employment opportunities, decent work and social inclusion, but also aim for more extensive compliance with social standards. The Guide aims to provide operational guidance on how to take social aspects into account in the definition of public tenders relating to supply, service and works contracts. It considers experiences of integrating social criteria in public procurement developed by different EU countries. The implementation of Green Public Procurement has also the purpose to develop circular supply chains, through the adoption of Minimum Environmental Criteria (CAM) for an increasing number of production sectors. CAM are currently in place for 18 categories of supplies and procurements. CAMs relating to the following areas are currently being defined or reviewed: – Supply of new interior furniture, rental service for interior furniture, repair service for furniture in use, end-of-life management service for used furniture (review) – Design and construction services for building interventions (review) – Beverage and food sales services (in-house bars and vending machines) (new) – Design and works services for new road construction and maintenance (new) – Supply of road transport vehicles (review) – Public transport service (new) – Street furniture (review) – PC and server (review) – Cultural events and movie-tv productions (new). CAM concerning the following areas, to be adopted in 2022 are: – Energy services for buildings (review); – Shoes (review). In addition, Legislative Decree No. 50 of 19 April 2016 in transposing EU Directives 23, 24 and 25/2014, outlines a regulatory framework for social and environmental responsibility in the management of public procurement, including the possibility of introducing criteria relating also to human rights within the contract life cycle (definition of the subject of the contract, criteria for selection of candidates, technical specifications, award criteria and contract performance clauses). The EU Commission has recently published a second edition of the guide for socially sustainable procurement (“Buying Social – A guide to taking account of social considerations in public procurement” – Second edition (2021/C 237/01)), referred to in the previous NAP BHR. It has provided indications to identify a set of clauses that will be included by ANAC in the Standard Notice for e-procurement. The inclusion of such clauses in the Standard Notice for contracts carried out through eprocurement platforms is a fundamental measure for their adoption by national contracting stations. The obligation to adopt electronic tools for tender procedures is in force since 2018. Moreover a strategic line to improve public procurement involves the professionalization of operators and the progressive centralization of purchases, thus facilitating the proper inclusion of social and ecological elements in procurement since the planning stage. To this scope a full life-cycle monitoring through the National Database of Public Contracts, managed by ANAC, will be facilitated by the adoption of the new models covered by Regulation (EU) 1780 of 2019, which will be fully operational in October 2023. In collaboration with other administrations concerned for adoption of models and adaptation to national requirements, ANAC will give right emphasis identification processes over social and environmental sustainability clauses in calls for tenders and compliance with them throughout the life cycle of the contract: this approach has already been used at European level to introduce new standard f for data collection and publication on contracts in order to monitor the achievement of the objectives set out in Directive (EU) 2019/1161 of 20 June 2019, on the promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles. As per the linkage between human rights and climate change, Italy deploys its action within a framework established and agreed at international and European level. In this context milestones are the Kyoto Protocol (1997), the Doha Amendment (2012) and the Paris Agreement (2015). In particular, the latter set the long-term goal to contain increase in global average temperature well below 2° Celtius and pursue efforts to limit increase to 1.5°C compared to pre-industrial levels. In this perspective, the Parties that signed the agreement communicated their “Nationally Determined Contribution” (NDC) with the obligation to pursue measures for its implementation. As part of this international de-carbonisation process, the EU has set its own targets to be achieved by 2020, 2030 and 2050. For 2020, the EU has adopted the so-called “ClimateEnergy Package 2020”, a set of legislative measures aimed at implementing the following objectives: reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by 20% compared to 1990 levels; reduction of energy consumption by 20% compared to the trend value (business as usual); production of energy from renewable sources equal to 20% of final energy consumption. In the second step of this process, the EU Council first set a 2030 target of a 40% reduction at European level compared to 1990, while raising the bar for efficiency to 32.5% and for renewables sources to 32%. However, following up on the Commission’s Communication on the European Green Deal of December 2019, the EU further changed the target for net domestic reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from -40% to -55% by- 2030 compared to 1990 levels. Finally, looking at the longer term, again following the Communication on the Green Deal, in pursuit of the aims of the Paris Agreement, it has committed to zero “net” greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 to give effect to the ambitious target as first continent with zero emissions. With regard to Italy and taking into consideration the goals set for 2030, the adequacy of the effort to be put in place for de-carbonisation can only be assessed starting within the framework of the current Integrated National Energy and Climate Plan. This is a planning tool provided for by Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 on the EU Energy Governance adopted after assessment by all stakeholders, both institutional and private, and which represents the country’s commitment and contribution for the implementation of the so-called “Climate and Energy Package”. Starting from the measures currently in force, the additional policies necessary to achieve the ‘medium-term’ targets are outlined. An important accelerating factor for the strengthening and implementation of the measures identified in the PNIEC is the new National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR), which gives the ecological transition a driving role in the relaunch of the country’s system. It assigns an important share of resources also for investments in sustainable mobility, renewable sources and energy efficiency, with a proper reference in mission n. 2 of the PNRR – “Green revolution and ecological transition”. Further expanding the horizon to 2050, Italy has outlined its engagement path towards “climate neutrality” with a National Long-Term Strategy (LTS), also provided for in the aforementioned EU Energy Governance Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 (https://www.minambiente.it/sites/default/files/lts January 2021.pdf). The Strategy incorporates virtuous energy-environmental trends triggered by the PNIEC from now until 2030 and identifies key levers to bring the Country to “zero net emissions.” It consists mainly of energy savings, mix of energy sources and new technologies to be developed in the short to medium term. Being the PNIEC integrated in the PNRR, the transition from traditional fuels to renewable sources should be accelerated abandoning coal in favour of an increasingly renewablebased electricity mix with a residual and complementary rate of natural gas (and an increasing contribution of renewable gases: biomethane, hydrogen and synthetic methane). In the long-term perspective to 2050, natural gas can be limited to marginal industrial uses (with CO2 capture), while considering their impact in terms of supply for the entire national energy system. In order to carry out strategies and projects drawn up, corrective measures are also being studied to be applied, especially in relation to the PNRR, with the aim of solving conflicts and disputes in advance and, consequently, speeding up administrative action. This will be possible by giving as much space as possible to public consultations, in accordance with principles of impartiality, inclusion, transparency, timeliness and feedback on decisional processes. To be healthy and resilient, a society must give nature the space it needs. The protection of biodiversity, “environmental debt” being towards future generations, also has unavoidable economic purposes which are useful to make the link between environment – human rights – business more evident and indissoluble. At the Environment G20 in Naples in 2021, our country prioritised a number of issues with direct implications for biodiversity and nature protection, ecosystem restoration and natural capital. Genes, species and ecosystem services are essential inputs for business and biodiversity conservation can bring direct economic benefits to many economic sectors: conservation of marine stocks could increase the annual profits of seafood industry while investments in natural capital, for example in restoring carbon-rich habitats and climate-friendly agriculture, are considered among the top five most important policies for fiscal consolidation as they offer high economic multipliers as well as positive climate impacts. In this perspective, the Ministry for Ecological Transition is committed to the definition of the National Biodiversity Strategy 2030, to be in line with the objectives already identified at EU level in the framework of the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2030 (including: ensuring that at least 30% of species and habitats whose current conservation status is unsatisfactory become so or show a clear positive trend; legally protecting at least 30% of the EU lands and 30% of EU seas, strictly protecting 10% of EU land and 10% of EU seas) and in related implementing measures and programmes. In coordination with the EU and its Member States, the Ministry is overseeing the negotiation of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity to be decided in May 2022 in Kunming, China. The Global Framework aims to encourage the use of nature-based solutions and promote ecosystem restoration, but also to ensure, through the adoption of whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches, that such comprehensive biodiversity action is effectively implemented and benefits people and communities. Moreover, with Italy’s contribution of almost USD 4 million, in 2021 UNESCO launched the “International Environmental Experts Network – UNESCO Network for Earth” Programme: it is the first global network of qualified environmental experts in favour of parks and territories of the highest natural value recognised by UNESCO on every continent: World Natural Heritage sites, Biosphere Reserves, Geoparks, Intangible Heritage communities. In the two-year period 2022-2023 the implementation phase of the UNESCO Network will continue, followed by Italy and launched at the G20 to the attention of major economies of the planet: it offers a capacity-building tool to support local communities and young people with specialized support in the areas of conservation and protection of ecosystems and biodiversity, prevention, mitigation and adaptation to climate change, training, education and environmental dissemination.” (pp. 34-40) “In order to make the sharing of data and information understandable and systematic, Consip published its second Sustainability Report, with the aim of describing its mandate and contribution to the national public procurement system. In order to ensure a clear and complete accounting of its actions, the Report was drafted according to GRI standards. It describes Consip’s operations and performance in terms of environmental, economic and social sustainability, noting how this approach has contributed to the achievement of some SDGs.” (p. 49) “Attention to human resources and compliance with local regulations on worker safety are relevant and qualifying elements in the evaluation of Profit Initiatives in order to ensure respect for workers’ rights, environmental and health standards and human rights. In the Call for Proposals, it is explicitly provided that the implementation of the interventions must take place in compliance with the principles and aims of Law No. 125/2014, international standards on human rights, decent work, social responsibility and environmental protection, as well as the rules on public contracts and, in particular, the Public Contracts Code.” (p. 55) “2. Update the implementation assessment information of Legislative Decree No. 231/2001 in order to evaluate its extension in terms of objectives and application of the administrative liability of legal persons, and to pursue the following objectives in this area: – the promotion of a culture of sustainability in its dimensions (economic-social-environmental), through the careful and accompanied reuse of the confiscated business assets” (p. 61) “17. With regard to key actions to be implemented in the context of environmental policies, the following ones are provided: – encourage the reduction of single-use plastic consumption towards systems based on the use of reusable products; – encourage repair, sharing and exchange of used goods; – encourage the development, emergence and consolidation of business models based on the ‘Product as a Service’ (Paas) model, so as to promote the design, manufacture and use of products that are resource-efficient, durable, decomposable, repairable, reusable and upgradeable, as well as the use of materials obtained from waste; – reduce waste, including through the recovery for social purposes of products (food and non-food) in surplus on the market or with characteristics unsuitable to be placed on the market; – strengthen the role of prevention and reuse within extended producer responsibility schemes, in particular by establishing a regulatory framework that allows a share of resources to be used to support waste reduction initiatives and to encourage prevention or production decrease; – promote cultural transformation by training, communicating and raising awareness on change needed and tools available.” (p. 63) “18. In collaboration with other Ministries composing the Interministerial Committee for the Ecological Transition (CITE) and, in particular, with the Ministry of the Economy and Finance and with the DIPE/CIPESS (for SACE guarantees), to the following measures will be promoted: ● the alignment of sustainability indicators within the “Voluntary environmental certification system for sustainable finance” (Art. 1, paragraphs 743, 744 and 745, of Law No. 178/2020) in relation to Regulation (EU) 2020/852; ● the assessment of criteria for the issue of guarantees by SACE S.p.a. in favour of green investments and provision of a quota of resources to be allocated to support projects to be launched within Environmental Economic Zones (ZEA) with an update commitment yearly due on 28 February.” (p. 63) “19. Among the measures identified in the 2021 programme and in the 2020-2022 multi-year programme, to be adopted to remove obstacles to full effectiveness of environmental certification and management systems within the activities of the Sections of the competent Committee, more directly the Ecolabel Section, engaged in the process started at European level on the issue of “sustainable finance” (COM 2018/97 “Action Plan to finance sustainable growth”), with the participation of central Administrations (Ministry of Economy and Finance, Ministry of Economic Development, Ministry of Health and ISPRA), the following measures are promoted: – allocation of resources for the implementation of interventions to develop EU Ecolabel and EMAS schemes; – realization of information events, addressed to potential users and stakeholders (companies, consumer associations, public administration, etc.); – realization of meetings with local actors in order to make users aware of added value of certifications; – involvement of public administration, both at local and central level, in order to identify specific training, information and regulatory tools to encourage the dissemination of EU Ecolabel and EMAS systems; – commitment, through collaboration with competent ministries, to enhance the use of the two certification systems within the initiatives over Circular Economy and the New Green Deal.” (p. 64) “20. In line with the EU Commission’s forthcoming guidelines on biodiversity, the following measures are to be taken: ● coverage over seabed and possible action on how to reconcile biodiversity targets in marine environments, including regulating bycatches of endangered species to be properly recovered; ● intensified collection of by-catch data on all sensitive species; ● fisheries management measures for all marine protected areas in accordance with clearly defined conservation objectives using the best available scientific advice; ● on land consumption, urban regeneration and redevelopment of heritage, promote an efficient use of buildings for significantly reduced emissions, as well as enhanced protection of green areas: – urban forestry; -digitalization of parks; – implementation of an advanced and integrated system for monitoring and preventing hydrogeological instability; ● on water, as envisaged by the PNRR, guarantee of sustainable management of water resources: this goal should be pursued through the development of primary water infrastructures, interventions for distribution networks and irrigation, sewage and purification systems.” (p. 64) “46. Strengthen support, at international and European level, for the promotion and inclusion of social and environmental sustainability clauses in international and trade and investment treaties.” (p. 68) “The NAP addresses the issue of the negative impact of business activities on human rights and identifies specific commitments with the aim of effectively integrating the UNGPs into the national system and business activities” and introduces limited objectives and actions, with reference to the national context translated into the following priorities: The fight against discrimination and inequality and the promotion of equal opportunities” (p. 10) “3. Combating all forms of discrimination in the definition of business companies’ strategic priorities in order to guarantee a performance that respects diversity, with particular reference to automated information management mechanisms and digital sustems” (p. 11) “With regard to gender discrimination in the workplace, territorial offices of the National Labour Inspectorate (INL), performing their supervisory activity, also carry out investigations in relation to equal opportunity regulations and the prohibition of gender discrimination in the workplace, including in terms of remuneration.” (p. 31) “In general, the issue of inclusion of vulnerable people in the workplace and the promotion of diversity management is a strategic line of action under the mandate of the National Anti-Racial Discrimination Office (UNAR). (…) On 24 November 2020, a Memorandum of Understanding was signed between UNAR, trade unions and employers’ organizations for the prevention and combating of discrimination in the workplace and the enhancement of differences. UNAR is also engaged in the implementation of specific actions to support sociooccupational inclusion of vulnerable persons, particularly at risk of marginality (transgender persons, RSC) under the NOP Inclusion 2014-2020, which will be reproposed also in the EU 2021-2027 programming. On this matter during 2020 the INL inspection staff implemented, as usual, initiatives for the prevention and promotion of legality, through the organization of specific information meetings, pursuant to Art. 8, paragraph 1, Legislative Decree No. 124/2004. It also deals with equal opportunities and combating discrimination in the workplace. Such regulation is among the competences of Labour Inspectorates at the local level. Through their own inspection staff, they can organize specific events with the purpose of guaranteeing and assuring proper compliance with labour regulations and social security and assistance measures, focusing on the social relevance as well as on legislative and interpretative innovations from Administrations. These initiatives are addressed not only to employers but also to all subjects operating in the labour market (in particular trade associations, professional unions and professional orders). Moreover, specific initiatives are carried out in schools in order to spread the culture of legality among the future actors of the labour market. (…) Important advances have also been recorded from the point of view of employers’ compliance with Law No. 76/2016 on civil unions, which includes, among other things: ‘marriage’ leave; obligation to extend leaves and permits provided by legislation and collective bargaining for certain family care needs (e.g., monthly paid leave to assist a partner with a severely disabled ascertained by Law No. 104/1992); obligation to extend welfare schemes, introduced by means of company collective agreements, concerning benefits (in addition to those provided for by collective bargaining) in terms of education, recreation, social or health care, flexible working hours, smart working. Finally, with regard to the gender dimension, during 2020 an important collaboration process was launched between the National Equality Advisor and Sodalitas Foundation, which represents companies that have signed the Charter for Equal Opportunity and Equality at Work in order to define a plan to relaunch the Charter in partnership with the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies. In this context, a number of activities were launched: monitoring of the Charter’s current signatories; design of a self-assessment tool on the implementation of the principles of diversity and inclusion; design of a new dedicated website; design of a bonus mechanism that provides a score for the most committed companies. On 12 November 2020, the event entitled “Integrating diversity at work: a valuable choice. The Charter for Equal Opportunities to spread the culture of diversity in companies” was held: it highlighted the essential role of creating partnerships and networks involving companies, national institutions and the EU Commission, in order to encourage change and reduce inequalities in the labour market. On this occasion the work of the “EU Diversity Charters Platform” of the EU Commission was presented, in which Italy launched the Charter for Equal Opportunities and best practices of some companies involved.” (p. 42) “11. Promote in a strengthened way women’s leadership and women’s empowerment in the business sector, through an effective implementation of Law No. 120/2011, and to strengthen measures to prevent gender discrimination in the workplace – depending on the better implementation of Law No. 4 of 15 January 2021 of ratification of the International Labour Organization Convention No. 190 on the Elimination of Violence and Harassment in the Workplace. To this complex end, further actions will be promoted to: i) certify equality for companies through the definition of a simple, fast, streamlined and objective tool that measures the situation of staff according to different factors (recruitment, remuneration, career development), capable of stimulating change and having an impact on the entire productive and social system; ii) assess the gender impact (ex-ante and ex-post) in all business processes, in particular with regard to corporate restructuring processes (relevant for safeguarding gender balance in the post-Covid phase); (iii) to promote transparency measures provided for in current legislation on compliance with gender equality rules by companies and public bodies.” (p. 62) “22. Encourage businesses in the dissemination of a culture of nondiscrimination by: i) the promotion of agreements/protocols of understanding with trade unions and employers’ organizations for common and synergic actions to prevent and combat forms of discrimination in the workplace and for the full inclusion of workers; ii) the collection of statistical data on discrimination in employment and diversity management practices in Italian companies; (iii) the promotion of good inclusive practices in the workplace; (iv) the promotion of socio-occupational inclusion of transgender people, also through information, training, accompaniment and support to self-entrepreneurship; v) the promotion of an action to involve Italian companies, in line with UN Standards Standards of Conduct for Business on Tackling Discrimination against LGBTI people, in order to prevent and countering discriminatory behaviors and conducts against LGBTIQ+ persons and ensuring the full enjoyment of their rights; vi) the promotion of socio-occupational inclusion of Roma, Sinti and Caminanti people in precarious socio-economic conditions also through actions aimed at starting employment diagnoses, planning of personalized support towards training and employment, promotion of active social policies to encourage participation in the labour market as well as opportunities and strategies for the development of entrepreneurial initiatives (such as, for example, accompaniment and support for business start-up and/or repositioning of economic companies operating in critical sectors); vii) the promotion of entrepreneurial policies and good practices on inclusion and diversity management, entailing the implementation and reporting of the Charter for Equal Opportunities and Equality at Work.” (p. 65) “23. Monitor the application of artificial intelligence in the workplace (e.g. recruitment mechanisms) for the purpose of assessing impact on human rights in terms of inclusion and non-discrimination.” (p. 65) The Italian NAP makes no explicit reference to export credit “In this area it is important to mention: – the implementation of the Regulation (EU) 2017/821 on “conflict minerals”: the Regulation entered into force on 1 January 2021 and Legislative Decree No. 13 of 2 February 2021 provides for its adequate domestic implementation”” (p. 12) “At the European level, the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 establishing supply chain Due Diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, minerals and gold, originating in conflict or high-risk areas, has recently led EU Member States to take action to adapt their legal and regulatory systems to introduce this new obligation for Union importers” (p. 44) “Italy acknowledges an enhanced attention to the respect of human rights in areas affected by armed conflict, where their promotion can be an essential tool to prevent conflict and rebuild more stable and peaceful societies. On this basis, and with specific reference to minerals from areas affected by conflict or at high risk – in particular in the gold sector – Italy has performed best practices through awareness campaigns and training activities in line with the OECD Guidelines on Due Diligence, as well as the relevant EU regulations. In addition, again with reference to responsible trade in minerals, Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council was adopted in 2017. This established supply chain Due Diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold, originating in conflict or high-risk zones. It has been transposed into Italian law through Legislative Decree No. 13 of 2 February 2021, which establishes Due Diligence obligations in the supply chain for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold, originating in conflict or high-risk areas.” (p. 52) “37. Fully implement Regulation (EU) 2017/821 establishing supply chain Due Diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold, originating in conflict or high-risk areas. 38. Further promote awareness of the OECD Guides on Due Diligence for Companies Operating in Weak Governance Zones (the “Risk Awareness Tool for Multinational Companies in Weak Governance Zones” and the “Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas”).” (p. 67) “2. What are the good practices adopted by stakeholders, in line with the measures of the first NAP BHR? Two further relevant aspects also emerged: typical conditions of countries at high risk, depending on the introduction of strict contractual clauses for trade transactions in such contexts – also in line with Regulation (EU) 2017/821 on minerals from “conflict or high risk areas”; the obligation of Due Diligence in relation to the import of minerals.” (p. 70) “In the management of financial instruments of development cooperation, with particular regard – but not limited to – facilities to Italian companies participating in joint ventures in partner countries, whose regulatory basis lies in Art. 27 of Law No. 125/14, standards on respect for human rights are introduced. In the implementing regulations approved by the Joint Committee referred to in Art. 21 of Law No. 125/14 on 28 April 2021 (Resolution 22/21), and which follows the adoption of CICS Resolution No. 5 of 11 June 2020, the presence of certifications on social responsibility issued on internationally recognized bases (ISO 26000, SA 8000), as well as formal adherence by the applicant company to the UN principles of the Global Compact will be considered a preferential qualification.” (p. 52) “51. In the framework of the monitoring action foreseen in the present NAP, the following priorities are established: (ii) identify any gaps or barriers that prevent or render less than fully effective access to judicial remedies for victims of business-related abuse, especially with respect to extra-territorial violations, including on the basis of the relationship between primary and subsidiary companies.” (p. 68) “the role of the institutions is crucial in terms of comparison and horizontal collaboration both internally (at the central level and in the European Delegations) and externally (with development banks and international financial institutions) and in the dialogue with Member States” (p. 9) “For the consolidation of the implementation commitments of the UNGPs in the framework of the first pillar, on the basis of the transposition of international standards at the national level, Italy intends to continue to ensure the highest level of protection of human rights from a legislative and operational perspective. To this end it is necessary: (…) – promote initiatives to raise awareness and information campaigns on the interconnections between business activities and human rights, on financial education and sustainable finance, through targeted interventions aimed at the younger generations, with reference to the paths for Transversal Skills and 15 Orientation (PCTO) provided by the Ministry of Education, in collaboration with representatives of teaching staff and students” (p. 14) “18. In collaboration with other Ministries composing the Interministerial Committee for the Ecological Transition (CITE) and, in particular, with the Ministry of the Economy and Finance and with the DIPE/CIPESS (for SACE guarantees), to the following measures will be promoted: – the alignment of sustainability indicators within the “Voluntary environmental certification system for sustainable finance” (Art. 1, paragraphs 743, 744 and 745, of Law No. 178/2020) in relation to Regulation (EU) 2020/852” (p. 63) “20. In line with the EU Commission’s forthcoming guidelines on biodiversity, the following measures are to be taken: – fisheries management measures for all marine protected areas in accordance with clearly defined conservation objectives using the best available scientific advice” (p. 64) “The NAP addresses the issue of the negative impact of business activities on human rights and identifies specific commitments with the aim of effectively integrating the UNGPs into the national system and business activities” and introduces limited objectives and actions, with reference to the national context translated into the following priorities: (…) 2. The fight against caporalato (especially in the agricultural and construction sectors) and forms of exploitation, forced labour, child labour, slavery and irregular work, with particular attention to migrants and victims of trafficking.” “Law No. 199/2016 on combating caporalato in agriculture has already achieved significant results: the Italian Government aims to fully implement the law, not only to repress the phenomenon but also to prevent it, as well as to strengthen the Network of quality agricultural work. To this end, on 16 October 2019, the Inter-institutional Steering Committee on Caporalato was set up, whose work led to the approval of the Three-Year Plan (2020 – 2022) in February 2020. This plan develops the national strategy to combat caporalato and labour exploitation in agriculture and obtained the agreement of the Unified Conference in May 2020. (…) It provides for an implementation strategy articulated in three different phases: an initial phase of analysis of the phenomenon, followed by emergency interventions in the most critical areas and then a systemic action that embraces the entire national territory. The latter is structured on four priority axes that concern: (i) prevention, (ii) vigilance and contrast to the phenomenon, (iii) protection and assistance for victims, (iv) their socio-occupational re-integration. For each of these axes, the Plan identifies priority actions (in a total of 10 actions of which 7 are dedicated to prevention) that involve, in a multi-level governance setting, the different administrations at central, regional and local level. The thematic priorities of the Plan were entrusted to six dedicated Groups, which were joined over time by two additional technical groups committed, respectively, to the development of the information system on the agricultural labour market and to the protection, assistance and socio-occupational reintegration of victims, both coordinated by the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies. In 2020 a new working group was created within the Committee coordinated by the Directorate General of Immigration and Integration Policies of the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies. It was dedicated to protection and first aid to victims of labour exploitation. The working group counts upon the collaboration of experts from the Department for Equal Opportunities of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers, ANCI Reception and Integration System (former SPRAR), the Directorate General for the fight against poverty 20 and social planning of the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies, Regions, ANPAL, INAPP, INL, IOM and Consorzio Nova. The work of the group, which started in December 2020, continued in the first half of 2021 and, in particular, 7 meetings were held which led, in line with the objectives of the Three-Year Plan, to the development of a draft of guidelines on the identification, protection and assistance of victims of labour exploitation and a proposal to amend the concerned legislation (Arts. 18 and 22 of Legislative Decree No. 286/1998). The Guidelines were officially presented to Committee in its meeting of 27 July 2021, obtaining broad consensus. The working group also started an in-depth analysis over forms of support and compensation provided in the current legislation and of additional measures that could be issued to promote better protection of victims of labour exploitation. (…) The National Institute of Labour (INL) has launched extraordinary surveillance campaigns based on a multi-agency approach in some areas of Southern Italy (only in the agricultural sector) and of Central and Northern Italy (mainly, but not only, in agriculture) where the phenomena of forced labour and labour exploitation of migrants are particularly present. In order to implement these projects, special task forces were set up consisting of local inspectors, Carabinieri from the Labour Inspectorate Units, inspectors from other territories, as well as the aforementioned cultural mediators. The inspections were 22 planned in coordination with local authorities (Public Prosecutor’s Office and Prefectures) and with other supervisory bodies involved from time to time (INPS, INAIL, State Police, GdF, ASL…). The presence of the IOM cultural mediators, moreover, favoured the establishment of a relationship of trust between the inspection bodies and exploited workers, promoting their cooperation and also ensuring the activity of taking charge and protection of potential victims for the purpose of their subsequent socio-occupational reintegration (also through the paths provided by Arts. 18 and 22 of Legislative Decree No. 286/1998 – Consolidated Immigration Act). (…) In 2020 the INL has significantly implemented its counteracting action on caporalato and labour exploitation. It has also implemented action 8 “Strengthening of surveillance activities and counteracting labour exploitation” of the Three-year Plan to combat labour exploitation in agriculture and caporalato (2020-2022) and of aforementioned project initiatives based on experimentational approach. In particular, the INL has carried out and coordinated extraordinary surveillance campaigns in some areas of Southern Italy (in the agricultural sector only, with the project Su.Pr.Eme (funded by the EU Commission and supported by the project PIU’ SU.PRE.ME, for an amount of about € 50 million for the implementation of interventions in Puglia, Campania, Basilicata, Calabria and Sicily) and Central Italy (mainly, but not only in agriculture, with the project A.L.T. Caporalato! project, financed by the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies for an amount of € 3 million for actions in the territories of central and northern Italy), where the phenomena of forced labour and labour exploitation of migrants are particularly diffused. In order to ensure the best possible organization of task forces in the geographical areas concerned, particular emphasis was placed on the activation of all useful coordination with the local Public Prosecutor’s Office and all appropriate institutional cooperation at territorial level with the Prefecture, the police and other supervisory bodies (INPS, INAIL and ASL). In order to ensure compliance with health and safety regulations and thus contribute to reducing the risk of accidents and preventing occupational deaths, all useful synergies have been activated within the Regional Committees pursuant to Art. 7 of the Consolidated Act No. 81/2008 and the Provincial Committees for the participation of ASL prevention technicians in the activities of the task forces. Finally, contacts were made with the IOM referents of each regional context and with the bodies and associations of the anti-trafficking network in territories involved to ensure timeliness and effectiveness of any interventions to take charge of and provide protection to victims of severe exploitation identified during the operations. According to collected data and constantly evolving, during 2020 in 44 weeks task forces took action in Basilicata, Campania, Calabria and Apulia Regions and in L’Aquila, Latina and Florence provinces: 758 inspections were carried out and 4,767 work positions were checked. As a result of the inspections (some of which are still in progress), to date, 1,069 workers have been identified as being involved in labour violations, 421 of whom were employed illegally, 205 potential victims of labour exploitation were identified and 22 perpetrators were reported to judicial authorities. INL inspection staff activities in the fight against caporalato and labour exploitation, despite difficulties due to the epidemiological emergency, have achieved the following results: – 478 offenders were referred to the judicial authorities, 61 of whom were arrested; – protection of 1,850 possible victims of the crime of caporalato and labour exploitation, 119 of whom are more exposed due to their non-EU citizenship status without a regular residence permit. In relation to the agricultural sector only: – 323 offenders were referred to judicial authorities, 43 of whom were arrested; – identification of 1,104 victims of exploitation, including 55 without a regular residence permit. The percentage of workers who are victims of labour exploitation in relation to the total number of irregular workers in the primary sector was by far the highest at 18.6%. On the other hand, taking as a reference the parameter of the number of irregular inspections defined in the year by the INL staff , in agriculture, an average of 37 exploited workers were found for every 100 inspected companies against which irregularities were contested. In 2021, in light of the significant results achieved the previous year also thanks to the extraordinary task forces of the two projects mentioned above, INL has further strengthened such inspection action on the territory through the scheduling of about 150 weeks of task force, with a commitment more than tripled compared to the 44 weeks of activities carried out in 2020. In addition, given the success of these experiences, on 11 March 2021 the INL and IOM signed a memorandum of understanding. Lasting two years, the memorandum is aimed at structuring the collaboration between the INL and IOM and extending multi-agency interventions to the whole national territory. It also takes into account the indications and objectives of the Three-Year Plan. On the basis of the lessons learnt, specific guidelines for the personnel employed in the surveillance operations on the territory are being developed within the Working Group coordinated by INL. (p.23) “The National Plan of Action against Trafficking and Serious Exploitation of Human Beings 2016-2018, implementing Directive (EU) 2011/36, is aimed at defining measures and intervention strategies for preventing and combating the phenomenon, as well as actions aimed at raising awareness, social prevention, emersion and social integration of victims. The Plan was articulated according to the following five key priorities: (a) identify, protect and assist trafficking victims; (b) intensify prevention of human trafficking; (c) strengthen prosecution of traffickers; (d) improve policy coordination and coherence among key stakeholders; and (e) increase knowledge of emerging issues related to all forms of human trafficking and provide an effective response. Given the complexity and multi-sectoral nature of the interventions, the Plan has provided for the establishment of a political-institutional Steering Committee, responsible for ensuring a multidisciplinary and integrated approach between institutional and private/social actors. It is flanked by a Technical Committee, composed of representatives of central and local government, law enforcement agencies, trade unions and third sector entities involved in the fight against human trafficking. Moreover, the Department for Equal Opportunities at the Presidency of the Council of Ministers is responsible for the data collection system SIRIT (Sistema Informatizzato per la raccolta di informazioni sulla tratta), managed and updated by the Veneto Region within the framework of the Agreement for the management of the service inherent in the “Antitrafficking toll-free number”. Given the persistence of the Covid-19 health emergency, the Department for Equal Opportunities introduced proper changes for public and private operators in charge of anti-trafficking projects. Taking into account the dynamics of trafficking in relation to confinement measures, the Department ensured the ongoing implementation of projects and by an ad hoc provision of 28 May 2020 established their extension until 31 December 2020, with a 7-months paid allowance worth over € 11 million. This approach was reiterated in order to further extend the anti-trafficking projects until 30 June 2021, while providing additional funding of approximately € 10 million. In 2021 the Department for Equal Opportunities has prepared a new call (Call No. 4/2021): it takes into account the changes some services have provided during the pandemic, but it will also be structured in such a way to respond to needs of operators. In 2020, the process aimed at drawing up the new Plan was started; to this end, both the Steering Committee and the Technical Committee were reconvened, within which 4 working tables were identified according to the four key directions prevention, prosecution, protection, partnership and cooperation. The opportunity to set up an ad hoc working group involving all the competent Administrations with the aim of strengthening the collaboration for data collection was shared. In particular, the new Plan will be based on the following key priorities: (a) improve the reliability and availability of data on trafficking, as a precondition for adequate monitoring of the phenomenon and better policy-making; (b) intensify actions to address trafficking for sexual exploitation, forced marriages, begging, forced crime, organ trafficking, sale of infants, all forms of labour exploitation; (c) address trafficking in the new context of the migration crisis (in fact, many victims of trafficking are involved in asylum application systems); (d) intensify the training of professionals who, in various capacities, have contact with victims, also in relation to the evolution of traffickers’ operational methods; (e) combat impunity for those who knowingly use trafficked persons; (f) strengthen efforts to prevent child trafficking for multiple exploitation purposes; (g) take further measures to improve the identification of trafficked persons; (h) facilitate and ensure access to compensation for trafficked persons; (i) continue to take measures to ensure that the return of trafficked persons is carried out with respect for their rights, safety and dignity and, with regard to children, in full compliance with the principle of the best interests of the child; (l) enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of investigation and prosecution activities. In the field of labour and social legislation, in the implementation of priorities of intervention provided in planning documents for surveillance activity, extraordinary inspection campaigns were launched to prevent and counteract the illegal phenomena of greatest social alarm. These include caporalato, and the exploitation of foreign citizens and their reduction to slavery through controls over production sectors and geographical areas most at risk, in close collaboration with enforcement law officers (Carabinieri, ASL, Guardia di Finanza, State Police). Although the prevention of contemporary forms of slavery and the protection of victims cannot disregard the fight against illegal phenomena and the restoration of legality, the most demanding challenge concerns the direct involvement of workers. This is especially in regard to those most exposed to the risk of abuse and oppression: they should be involved in training courses to know their fundamental rights, for a greater awareness of defense tools provided and encourage a relationship of trust with the institutions. It should also be noted that, if during supervisory activities the presence of illegally employed irregular foreign workers is ascertained, the inspection staff is required to fill out and deliver a form to inform the foreign worker of his/her right to unpaid wages and insurance and social security contributions and how to enforce this right, as well as to sanction and take restrictive measures against involved employers.” (p. 25) “3. Strengthen the role of competent bodies and inspection activities in combating and controlling the emergence of irregular work and caporalato, pursuant to Art. 103 of the “Relaunch” Decree-Law No. 34 of 19 May 2020 (“Emergence of labour relations”).” (p. 61) “4. Ensure the full implementation of the Three-Year Plan to Combat Labor Exploitation in Agriculture and Caporalato 2020-2022.” (p. 61) “5. Develop new coordination measures in the activities of prevention and control of the phenomenon of irregular work and to encourage the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies, Ministry of Quality: description of expected objectives and results achieved 62 operation of the “Network of quality agricultural work”.” (p. 61) “6. Ensure full implementation of the National Action Plan against Trafficking and Serious Exploitation of Human Beings” (p. 62) “13. Consolidate the commitment made at the national level with respect to international standards, in particular the Protocol relating to ILO Convention on Forced Labour of 2014 and Recommendation CM/Rec(2016)3 (monitoring) adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe with reference to business and human rights.” (p. 63) “14. Update the information on the current legislative framework to combat illegal work and labour exploitation in the agricultural, construction, manufacturing and service sectors.” (p. 63) “54. Ensure an adequate level of resources dedicated to legal aid, and ensure access to free legal aid also for non-resident foreign nationals, in particular for irregular migrants who are victims of crimes committed by criminal organizations, such as trafficking in human beings, and enable them to report such crimes regardless of their status.” (p. 68) The Italian NAP makes no explicit reference to freedom of association “Also within the framework of specialized agencies of international organizations such as UNCE/FACT the duty of care has been addressed in a structural manner by producing a Recommendation no. 46: “For the improvement of traceability and transparency of sustainable value chains in the apparel and footwear sector”. This Recommendation, aimed at supporting sustainable development through the promotion of business models marked by the adoption of the duty of care and to develop responsible consumption, was approved at the 27th Plenary Session of the United Nations Economic and Social Council in April 2021 and is now being implemented. Italy has followed the above-mentioned process and will continue to provide its contribution to the international debate, taking into proper consideration not only potential risks depending upon lack of Due Diligence but also the factual impact of business conduct stemming from a scarce Due Diligence.” (p. 44) “The second Italian NAP-BHR intends to strengthen the application of the UNGPs through a series of complementary measures, referring in particular to the following guidelines: (…) – the commitment to update and improve collective action in relation to multiple human rights issues from the perspective of protecting the ‘most vulnerable’ (women and girls, minors, persons with disabilities, LGBTIQ+ persons, migrants and asylum seekers, persons belonging to ethnic and religious minorities, the elderly), with the aim to empower their role and involvement as right-holders, where individual aspects related to business activities may have a significant impact on these categories from a labour and economic point of view.” (p. 7) a) Introduction “A particular attention to BHR issues has been introduced in the Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy 2020-2024, in the perspective of a wider process for the elaboration of a comprehensive EU framework dedicated to the implementation of the UNGPs. In the aforementioned document, the institutions commit themselves to conducting a dialogue with businesses in order to increase the level of protection and promotion of human rights, with the aim of combating corruption and introducing good practices in the area of corporate social responsibility, Due Diligence, accountability and access to remedy, and to fostering contacts and exchanges between businesses and civil society also in the area of women’s empowerment, sustainable development and decent work.” (p. 9) “5. Strengthening of measures to prevent and combat all forms of exploitation in the labour sector, both public and private, infering vulnerable groups as victims, with particular reference to women, minors, persons with disabilities and LBTIQ+ people” (p. 11) “Finally, for a targeted sectoral intervention concerning vulnerable categories, it is important to enhance wider knowledge in the business world about some guidelines adopted in this field: the Guidelines on Childhood and Adolescence, recently revised, the Cooperation Guidelines on Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, Girls and Children (2020-2024) and the Guidelines on Disability and Social Inclusion in Cooperation Interventions (2018); the latter one has established relevant targets: increasing the awareness of companies to improve the employment of persons with disabilities; fostering employment through training activities using new information technologies” (p. 25) The so-called glass ceiling, i.e. the set of barriers that women meet in their career to reach top positions, is still a widespread phenomenon. However, the representation of women in positions of power and in management bodies of a political, economic and social nature has improved significantly, especially thanks to the results in terms of female participation on boards of directors. As of today, in fact, it is higher than the European average thanks mainly to the implementation of Law No. 120/2011 (the so-called Golfo-Mosca Law). The share of women on the boards of directors of listed companies is close to 40% (38.8% in 2020), almost four times than recorded before for the implementation of the Law (11.6% in 2012). In public companies, women hold one-third of the positions (33.1% in 2020) in management and control bodies, almost doubling the number recorded in 2014 (17.5%). However, there is still a significant disparity in companies that are not subject to the law, where participation is only around 18%, compared to the most advanced countries in Europe. However, discrepancies in other top positions remain significant. The participation of women in top bodies of the public administration is more or less in line with the European average at national level, with a presence of women of about 35% in Governments and Parliaments, although it is further behind the more advanced countries such as Sweden, Finland and France, which have achieved parity. Finally, the representation of women in top management bodies of important bodies in the socio-cultural field, such as research institutes, public radio and television service companies and Olympic committees, is still very low. In 2018, an inter-institutional Observatory, aimed at monitoring the implementation of Law No. 120/2011 was established in the framework of a 5-year Memorandum of Understanding signed by the Department for Equal Opportunities of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers, CONSOB and the Italian National Bank. Acting as a supervisory body on female participation, the Department for Equal Opportunities initiated 391 administrative proceedings against companies whose composition of the Boards of Directors /of Statutory Auditors did not respect gender balance. Overall, these measures have proven to be effective tools to promote the presence of women in top positions and have shown a positive correlation between female empowerment and improved corporate performance. As such, Law No. 120/2011 was renewed in 2019 within the Budget Law 2020 towards the target of 40% percentage of women in corporate boards. Regarding gender leadership issues, the Task Force “Women for a New Renaissance”, established by the Ministry of Equal Opportunities and Family in 2020 to address the impact of Covid-19 on gender issues has produced a Final Report, based on quantitative data and qualitative scientific information on the impact of the pandemic in different sectors. Among the Task Force’s multiple proposals there are those ones targeted to: – increase the proportion of women in all areas of employment; – overcoming barriers to advancement in career paths, particularly in the fastest growing fields (STEM, computer science, cloud computing, data and artificial intelligence); – countering gender stereotypes that prevent women from achieving leadership responsibilities, in order to activate new energies and opportunities for all. The National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR) also addresses gender inequalities in a cross-cutting manner. In particular, the PNRR places three cross-cutting priorities alongside the three strategic axes shared at European level (digitalization and innovation, ecological transition and social inclusion). This includes the promotion of gender equality, with the aim of investing at least € 7 billion by 2026, to be used to ensure a level playing field in the labour market, close the gender pay gap and increase the number of women in positions of responsibility, ultimately including the presence of women in the political sphere. It is necessary to underline that the PNRR is strongly related to the priorities of the National Strategy for Gender Equality 2021-2026, recently adopted by our Government and elaborated by the Department for Equal Opportunities in coherence with the European Strategy. The National Strategy presents five priorities (work, income, skills, time, power) and aims, among other things, to climb five points by 2026 in the ranking of the Gender Equality Index of the European Institute for Gender Equality (Italy is currently in 14th place, with a score of 63.5 points out of 100, 4.4 points lower than the EU average). The PNRR activities consist of a programme aimed both at encouraging women’s participation in the labour market and in career advancement and at correcting the imbalances that hinder equal opportunities from school age onwards, in line with the second principle of the European pillar of social rights. In order not to put women in the position of having to choose between motherhood and career, the Strategy envisages measures to strengthen welfare, also to allow for a more equitable distribution of commitments, related to parenthood, that are not solely economic. Furthermore the PNRR envisages a specific investment (about € 400 million) to support female entrepreneurship. This improves the current system of support, incentivizing the implementation of innovative entrepreneurial projects for companies with prevalent female participation, providing for mentoring activities, technical-managerial support, work-life balance measures, as well as targeted communication actions, particularly in schools and universities, for the creation of a favourable and emulative cultural climate for female entrepreneurship. The PNRR also provides for the introduction of a national certification system for gender equality that involves the Department for Equal Opportunities. This measure intends to accompany companies in reducing gaps in all of the most critical areas for the professional growth of women and to strengthen wage transparency by guaranteeing companies that will adopt strategies and measures aimed at promoting gender equality within their organizations, (e.g. promotion of women in decision-making positions, introduction of welfare measures for work-life balance, measures to facilitate the return/entry to work of women after maternity leave). For these reasons they should obtain a high index in the certification of gender equality, so to benefit from any tax breaks adopted by the Government. The PNRR includes specific investments in STEM skills as well. In this regard, the implementation of a programme managed by the Ministry of Education, in collaboration with the Department for Equal Opportunities, has been envisaged for the strengthening of STEM, digital skills and orientation activities for girls and young women in order to improve their job prospects and allow Italy to converge with European averages. (…) Law No. 4 of 15 January 2021, ratifying and implementing the International Labour Organization Convention n. 190 on the elimination of violence and harassment in the workplace, represents an important evolution in the field of gender protection in the business context. Legislative Decree No. 81/08 and related Decree No. 106/09 had adequately covered safety issues in the workplace, but had not included the issue of harassment, which in fact is limited to occupational safety measures or to internal policies and voluntary practices of companies. In addition, to clarifying the scope of their application, measure 4/2021 provides for the adoption of an inclusive, integrated and gender-centred approach: the private sector, like the public sector, is therefore adopting concrete procedures and tools with the goal of combating violence and protecting employees through guidance and training on prevention. With regard to gender discrimination in the workplace, territorial offices of the National Labour Inspectorate (INL), performing their supervisory activity, also carry out investigations in relation to equal opportunity regulations and the prohibition of gender discrimination in the workplace, including in terms of remuneration. On gender issues related to equality and equal opportunities, they also take into consideration the reports submitted by the Councillors and Equality Councillors as part of the institutional collaboration with the Territorial Labour Institutes, as provided for by Art. 15 of Legislative Decree No. 198/2006. In this regard, in 2018, a new memorandum of understanding was signed between the INL and the National Council of Equality: it was aimed at strengthening the collaboration between the Inspection Agency and the National Network of Councilors/Equality Directors, with particular regard to physical and economic protection of pregnant women and working mothers. As such, in 2019, inspection staff intervened in favour of 466 female workers in the tertiary sector, traditionally characterized by a higher rate of female employment as well as a higher rate of this type of violation (i.e. 81%, compared to 16% in industry, 2% in construction and 1% in agriculture). Moreover, the inspection staff is engaged in prevention activities (pursuant to Art. 8 of Legislative Decree No. 124/2004) aimed at promoting the correct application of the regulations in force in the labour market (i.e. with private companies, employers’ and trade union organizations and trade associations). With reference to the fight against discrimination in the field of equal opportunities and the phenomenon of the so-called “blank resignation”, the role of protection and monitoring carried out by INL in relation to resignations and consensual terminations of working mothers and working fathers with children up to 3 years of age should also be recalled. In fact, the Territorial Offices manage (pursuant to Art. 55, paragraph 4, of Legislative Decree No. 151/2001) the validation procedure of resignations and consensual terminations of workers during the first 3 years of their children’s life, in order to ensure a greater protection of these subjects through an interview aimed at verifying the genuineness of the consent to the termination of the employment relationship. Data concerning these measures are monitored annually, through the use of a special ministerial computer application used by IITTLL staff to issue validations. Information that emerges from this monitoring is provided in the Annual report on the validation of resignations and consensual terminations of working mothers and working fathers, prepared by INL with the contribution of the Office of the National Councillor for Equality and available in the appropriate section of the Agency’s website. Paragraph 9 of Art. 47 of Decree-Law No. 77 of 31 May 2021, converted into Law No. 108 of 29 July 2021, provided for the obligation to publish on the buyer’s profile, in the “Transparent Administration” section (pursuant to Art. 29 of Legislative Decree No. 50 of 18 April 2016) the reports on the personnel situation (pursuant to Art. 46 of Legislative Decree No. 198 of 11 April 2006) and gender reports on the situation of male and female staff in each of the professions and in relation to the status of recruitment, training, professional promotion, levels, changes in category or qualification, other mobility phenomena, the intervention of the Cassa integrazione guadagni (wages guarantee fund), redundancies, early retirements and retirements, and remuneration actually paid. The provision also provides for an obligation to communicate such data to the Presidency of the Council of Ministers or to the Ministers or delegated authorities for equal opportunities and the family and for youth policies and universal civil service (in July 2021 this provision was included by ANAC among those relevant for the purposes of updating the National Anti-Corruption Plan).” (p. 29) “Italy also promotes “family friendly policies”, as national and corporate policies aimed at supporting workers in their role as parents/caregivers. On this issue, UNICEF has formulated some important indications on the best ways Governments and the private sector can build “family friendly” policies: – encouraging employers to introduce gender-sensitive and inclusive paid leave entitlements, flexible working arrangements and childcare support systems; – the introduction of paid parental, maternity and paternity paid leave in the early-birth period and for the first year of a child’s life; fair and gender-sensitive parental leave to ensure that no parent is overburdened by family care; leave available to all, both for fulltime employees and those working part-time or under non-standard contractual arrangements; and financial coverage linked to birth care; – childcare services made accessible by the end of parental leave, so that there is no gap in available support; – quality childcare services, made accessible, flexible and affordable, available to all children, regardless of family circumstances; – alignment of childcare services with other family support policies, such as universal family allowances, to reduce the risk of existing inequalities in access to public childcare facilities.” (p. 41) “In general, the issue of inclusion of vulnerable people in the workplace and the promotion of diversity management is a strategic line of action under the mandate of the National Anti-Racial Discrimination Office (UNAR). (…) UNAR is also engaged in the implementation of specific actions to support sociooccupational inclusion of vulnerable persons, particularly at risk of marginality (transgender persons, RSC) under the NOP Inclusion 2014-2020, which will be reproposed also in the EU 2021-2027 programming.” (p. 41) “Finally, with regard to the gender dimension, during 2020 an important collaboration process was launched between the National Equality Advisor and Sodalitas Foundation, which represents companies that have signed the Charter for Equal Opportunity and Equality at Work in order to define a plan to relaunch the Charter in partnership with the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies. In this context, a number of activities were launched: monitoring of the Charter’s current signatories; design of a self-assessment tool on the implementation of the principles of diversity and inclusion; design of a new dedicated website; design of a bonus mechanism that provides a score for the most committed companies. On 12 November 2020, the event entitled “Integrating diversity at work: a valuable choice. The Charter for Equal Opportunities to spread the culture of diversity in companies” was held: it highlighted the essential role of creating partnerships and networks involving companies, national institutions and the EU Commission, in order to encourage change and reduce inequalities in the labour market. On this occasion the work of the “EU Diversity Charters Platform” of the EU Commission was presented, in which Italy launched the Charter for Equal Opportunities and best practices of some companies involved.” (p. 43) “7. Fully implement the provisions contained in the new legislation on Development Cooperation, with particular focus on the relationship between for-profit and not-for-profit actors and promote the widest knowledge among companies of the Guidelines on Childhood and Adolescence, the Cooperation Guidelines on Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, Girls and Children (2020-2024) and the Guidelines on Disability and Social Inclusion in Cooperation Interventions.” (p. 62) “11. Promote in a strengthened way women’s leadership and women’s empowerment in the business sector, through an effective implementation of Law No. 120/2011, and to strengthen measures to prevent gender discrimination in the workplace – depending on the better implementation of Law No. 4 of 15 January 2021 of ratification of the International Labour Organization Convention No. 190 on the Elimination of Violence and Harassment in the Workplace. To this complex end, further actions will be promoted to: (i) certify equality for companies through the definition of a simple, fast, streamlined and objective tool that measures the situation of staff according to different factors (recruitment, remuneration, career development), capable of stimulating change and having an impact on the entire productive and social system; (ii) assess the gender impact (ex-ante and ex-post) in all business processes, in particular with regard to corporate restructuring processes (relevant for safeguarding gender balance in the post-Covid phase); (iii) to promote transparency measures provided for in current legislation on compliance with gender equality rules by companies and public bodies.” (p. 62) “12. Consolidate AGCOM’s monitoring action on gender issues within the information sector and in particular the press profession” (p. 62) “16. Further promote an effective implementation of Legislative Decree No. 254/2016 implementing Directive (EU) 2014/95 on the disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by large companies and groups of companies, including through a benchmarking exercise carried out on a sample of companies and aimed at analyzing the effective inclusion of the human rights dimension in non-financial reports published by companies and supervised by CONSOB, including in relation to diversity and gender.” (p. 63) “22. Encourage businesses in the dissemination of a culture of nondiscrimination by: (i) the promotion of agreements/protocols of understanding with trade unions and employers’ organizations for common and synergic actions to prevent and combat forms of discrimination in the workplace and for the full inclusion of workers; (ii) the collection of statistical data on discrimination in employment and diversity management practices in Italian companies; (iii) the promotion of good inclusive practices in the workplace; (iv) the promotion of socio-occupational inclusion of transgender people, also through information, training, accompaniment and support to self-entrepreneurship; (v) the promotion of an action to involve Italian companies, in line with UN Standards Standards of Conduct for Business on Tackling Discrimination against LGBTI people, in order to prevent and countering discriminatory behaviors and conducts against LGBTIQ+ persons and ensuring the full enjoyment of their rights;” (p. 65) “40. Strengthen the action of the Italian Cooperation on gender equality, including through support to the economic development of women in post-conflict situations in line with the three UN Pillars (peace and security, development and human rights) and in the context of the legislative and programmatic framework of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 “Women, Peace and Security” and Fourth National Action Plan on Women, Peace and Security adopted by Italy in 2020.” (p. 67) “42. Preparation – by and/or in collaboration with the Inter-ministerial Committee for Human Rights – of spaces and activities for awareness raising and training on human rights and business (with particular attention to the so-called vulnerable categories (women, minors, persons with disabilities, LGBTIQ+ persons, minorities, migrants, etc.) designed as tools for support to businesses and public officials.” (p. 67) “Also on the European level, especially since 2019, a wider and more comprehensive view about corporate social responsibility and responsible business conduct has been encouraged, concretely confirmed witnessed by numerous business good practices in compliance with a series of voluntary measures and regulations. The renewed and dynamic entrepreneurial approach is based on corporate governance structures to overcoming short-term financial advantages for environmental, social and human sustainability in the medium and long term in the context of the European Union’s initiatives on the circular economy, biodiversity and sustainable financial growth. (…) Finally, the importance of the business with respect to the three areas of action – People, Planet, Prosperity – at the core of the agenda of the Italian Presidency of the G20-2021, constituted a further operational area with particular reference to the W20 (Women) and B20 (Business) engagement groups. The promotion of informal debate events on the BHR issue aimed at improving good practices of large Italian companies (such as, for example, ENI – recently positioned at the top of the “Corporate Human Rights Benchmark 2020” – and ENEL, member of the Board of the “United Nations Global Compact”)” (p. 12) “The General Directorate for Immigration and Integration Policies of the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies and the International Labour Organization (ILO) further enhanced project initiatives through the publication of the call “Together to combat labour exploitation in agriculture” in November 2020. It allowed the selection and collection of a catalogue of good practices. In particular, public and private actors, associations, employers’ organizations and trade unions were invited to describe their practices by responding to a 37-question online questionnaire, which allowed an analysis on the basis of seven objective criteria: relevance and coherence, effectiveness, impact, efficiency, sustainability, innovation and replicability. A group of labour and social protection experts chaired by the Ministry and supported by the ILO reviewed and evaluated 67 proposals. These initiatives have been adequately enhanced in June 2021 through the publication of a catalogue including the 50 most promising practices on the institutional portal www.integrazionemigranti.gov.it” (p. 22) “About relevant government policies to improve the participation of persons with disabilities in the workforce, it should be noted that Legislative Decree No. 151/2015 introduced some provisions aimed at rationalizing and revising the procedures and fulfilments of targeted insertion of persons referred to Law No. 68/1999 and other subjects entitled to compulsory placement, in order to promote social inclusion, placing and integration into the labour market and taking care of skills of persons with disabilities. In particular, the adoption of specific guidelines on the targeted placement of persons with disabilities envisages to promote: (…) – good practices of job inclusion (…) In the reform context, a decisive relevance was attributed to the systematic collection of data available in targeted placement, as well as data relating to good practices of work inclusion of persons with disabilities, aids and adaptations on workplaces. In this regard Legislative Decree No. 151/2015, in order to rationalize the collection of data, to simplify the obligations, as well as to improve the monitoring and evaluation of the interventions, has envisaged the creation of a specific section called “Targeted placement database” within the active and passive policies database, to collect information on public and private employers subject to the employment obligation.” (p. 27) “(…) the second Italian NAP-BHR intends to strengthen the application of the UNGPs through a series of complementary measures, referring in particular to the following guidelines: – addressing issues and practices related to the protection of the environment, health, decent work and ‘Human Rights Defenders’, also in the face of the new challenges posed by the gig economy and in the context of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), in correlation with the challenges of multi-dimensional post-Covid-19 reconstruction” (p. 7) “In order to ensure compliance with health and safety regulations and thus contribute to reducing the risk of accidents and preventing occupational deaths, all useful synergies have been activated within the Regional Committees pursuant to Art. 7 of the Consolidated Act No. 81/2008 and the Provincial Committees for the participation of ASL prevention technicians in the activities of the task forces” (p. 22) “With reference to the need to draw attention to impacts of business activity on family life and children’s rights, the Department for Family Policies published the new public call “#Conciliamo”, amounting to € 74 million, on 8 November 2019 for family-work reconciliation projects by companies, networks and groups of associated or controlled companies. Available funds will be used for interventions that promote a welfare tailored to families and to improve the quality of life of working mothers and fathers. The call has several specific objectives: the demographic revival, increase in female employment, rebalancing of workloads between men and women, support for families with relatives with disabilities, health protection, combating the abandonment of the elderly.” (p. 42) “10. Consolidate respect for the fundamental rights of people with disabilities in line with international conventional standards in relation to access to and quality of hospital care through the promotion and dissemination of the “Charter of Rights of People with Disabilities in Hospital” created by the Coop. Sociale Onlus Spes contra Spem in 2010.” (p. 62) “(…) the second Italian NAP-BHR intends to strengthen the application of the UNGPs through a series of complementary measures, referring in particular to the following guidelines: – addressing issues and practices related to the protection of the environment, health, decent work and ‘Human Rights Defenders’, also in the face of the new challenges posed by the gig economy and in the context of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), in correlation with the challenges of multi-dimensional post-Covid-19 reconstruction” (p. 7) “(…) in order to ensure the continuity of the dialogue carried out in the drafting phase of the first NAP with non-institutional stakeholders , provisions were made for the establishment of a consultative group. This was usually conveyed in an open dialogue meeting with the GLIDU (following each of the two annual meetings) whose participants were invited to propose contributions on the issue representing business associations, trade unions, non-governmental organizations, civil society, human rights defenders, experts in the field and the academic world.” (p. 10) “(…) strengthen cooperation with trade unions, human rights defenders, nongovernmental organizations and civil society, and ensure adequate support because of their essential role in promoting and protecting human rights in business and production processes;” (p. 14) “In Italy Whistleblowing was introduced by the anti-corruption law (Law No. 190 of 6 November 2012, “Provisions for the prevention and repression of corruption and illegality in public administration”), adopted in compliance with recommendations and conventional obligations emanating from the UN, OECD, Council of Europe and European Union. This law provides for a system of enhanced protection for public employees who report unlawful conducts. Law No. 179 of 30 November 2017 strengthened the preexisting whistleblower protection for public employees and partially extended the same protection to the private sector. With regard to the public sector, the law provides that a public employee who reports illegal or unethical conduct in the public interest cannot be retaliated against through sanctions, dismissal, demotion, transfer to other offices or other measures that have a negative effect on his/her working conditions. The protection is guaranteed to: employees of public administrations; employees of public economic entities; employees of private law entities subject to public control; employees and collaborators of private companies that provide goods, works or services to the public administration. Employees can report a violation : – to the person responsible for the prevention of corruption and transparency, – the National Anti-Corruption Authority (ANAC), and – to the judicial or accounting authority. The law covers misconduct and ethical errors, including (but not limited to): criminal conduct; violations of codes of conduct; mismanagement of public resources; nepotism; 51 accounting irregularities; violations of environmental and occupational safety regulations, etc. The protection entails, albeit within certain limits, the confidentiality of the whistleblower’s identity. The main protection mechanisms also include: the reversal of the burden of proof on retaliation on the administration, the reinstatement of the employee whose dismissal has been found to be retaliatory, and a financial penalty against the author of the retaliatory act or conduct ranging from € 5,000 to €30,000 imposed by ANAC. A desk service is available to whistleblowers who report cases of unlawful conduct in their workplace. The reports are acquired through a dedicated software, which guarantees confidentiality, security and reliability of whistleblowers. ANAC has made the computer application used for the acquisition and management of reports of wrongdoing by employees (“Whistleblower” software) available for re-use by administrations and companies with a European Union Public License (EUPL), which allows free use without further authorization from ANAC. Focusing on the private sector, the law provides some mandatory whistleblowing requirements for those companies that have chosen (or choose) to implement a “231 Model”. In particular, companies must provide communication channels that allow the submission of reports based on precise and factual elements connected with crimes as listed in Legislative Decree No. 231/2001. These communication channels must guarantee the confidentiality of the whistleblower in the management of the report; in addition, at least one alternative reporting channel must be provided which guarantees – using ad hoc software – the confidentiality of the whistleblower’s identity; the 231 model must also prohibit acts of retaliation, direct or indirect discriminatory actions against the whistleblower for reasons connected to the report/alert. Sanctions must be introduced in the disciplinary system adopted with the 231 model, both for those who violate the whistleblower protection measures and for the whistleblowers themselves who make malicious or seriously negligent reports that turn out to be unfounded; discriminatory measures may be reported to the Labour Inspectorate and to the competent trade union organizations. In addition, discriminatory dismissals, job changes and any discriminatory measures taken against the whistleblower will be void unless the company can demonstrate that they are in no way related to the whistleblowing activity. EU Directive 2019/1937, which regulates the “protection of persons who report breaches of Union law”, is currently being transposed in Italy, introducing common rules aimed at ensuring the protection of employees who report wrongdoing or breaches (“Whistleblowers”) in the Member States’ legal systems. It should be noted that some large Italian companies, announcing a policy of “zero tolerance” towards fraud and corruption, have been pioneers in this field, having created protected channels of reporting with a guarantee of anonymity even before the entry into force of the above-mentioned law. With the support of Transparency International – Italy, they have recently voluntarily adopted an online whistleblowing platform that is more advanced than the tools currently in use and that conforms to the highest standards of confidentiality.” (p. 50) “Italy has participated in [the UN ‘Accountability and Remedy’] project, reporting the introduction of legislative measures aimed at this purpose and at facilitating even corporate structures for the introduction of remedial mechanisms-models, referring to multiple legal disciplines (contracts, competition, arbitration, labour law, consumer law, environmental law, privacy, non-discrimination and legislative measures for equality, protection of freedom of information and protection of whistle-blowers).” (p. 56) “(…) it is also worth highlighting how the multi-stakeholder approach has been translated in the promotion and preservation of a constant and fruitful dialogue with non-institutional actors (businesses, trade unions, civil society, human rights defenders, experts and representatives of academia)” (p. 60) “49. Continue to support and promote in a multi-stakeholder framework the Guidelines on Business and Human Rights Defenders, through eventually of a pilot programme with the active participation and collaboration of a selected and significant group of Italian companies and civil society organizations” (p. 68) The Italian NAP makes no explicit reference to human rights impact assessments. The Italian NAP makes no explicit reference to indigenous peoples. “46. Strengthen support, at international and European level, for the promotion and inclusion of social and environmental sustainability clauses in international and trade and investment treaties.” (p. 68) Read more about Investment treaties & investor-state dispute settlements “Twenty years after the approval of Legislative Decree No. 231 of 2001, which governs the administrative liability of companies and entities, the Ministry of Justice has recently set up a working group with the CNPDS (National Centre for Prevention and Social Defence Foundation), Confindustria and Assonime. The aim is to measure the effectiveness and consistency of regulations on administrative liability for crimes of collective entities within the country. and to assess the appropriateness of any reforming measures. In particular, the working group intends to propose solutions to remedy the following critical aspects of the current legislation: – insufficient focus on the size and organizational complexity of companies covered by Legislative Decree No. 231/2001, with particular reference to small and medium-sized companies, as well as public bodies; – heterogeneous nature of the catalogue of offences; – difficult adaptability of criteria such as interest and advantage to cases when the offence upon the company makes it directly responsible; – lack of clarity regarding the composition and powers of the Supervisory Board; – requirement of fraudulent avoidance in cases where the offence is committed by a senior officer/manager; – low appreciation of national and international standards incorporated in organizational business models; – impact on judicial (un)assessment over business models; – lack of legislative recognition about procedural collaboration from companies (e.g. probation as for US DPA and NPA), against the introduction of non-accountability of physical persons (e.g. in tax crimes and crimes against the public administration); – evaluation of the potential impact of precautionary measures, both of a real and prohibitory nature, also by virtue of the correlation between precautionary measures and definitive sanctions as governed by Legislative Decree No. 231/2001; – complexity of the sanctioning system, having regard to limited pecuniary sanctions, complex nature of confiscation, possible impact of prohibitory sanctions, absence of sanctions expressly aimed at favouring a compliant re-organization of the entity.” (p. 17) “Equally relevant is the recent legislative reform on class actions with respect to entrepreneurial plaintiffs, which took place with Law No. 31 of 12 April 2019, entered into force on 19 May 2021. In its executive dimension, this measure provides for the possibility for the competent court to impose on the company concerned the obligation to disclose relevant documents in case claimants demonstrate that such documentation was necessary for the decision on the case.” (p. 34) “2. Update the implementation assessment information of Legislative Decree No. 231/2001 in order to evaluate its extension in terms of objectives and application of the administrative liability of legal persons, and to pursue the following objectives in this area: – efficient asset management and economic qualification of assets by treating them as a source of wealth for the community; – the fight against the crisis and the rate of unemployment suffered by economic sectors most affected by measures to counter the epidemic emergency (catering and the gastronomic sector; tourism/hotel sector; small businesses/individuals in the craft and retail sectors of Made in Italy); – the prevention of the social fallout related to the confiscation of business and, in particular, the disaffection of the citizenry towards criminal justice operators; – the promotion of a culture of sustainability in its dimensions (economic-social-environmental), through the careful and accompanied reuse of the confiscated business assets; – the implementation of inclusion policies that enhance the value of the human being coming from the most socially fragile contexts, with particular reference to the contribution offered by female population, through its full involvement in management and in social recovery of the assets in question; – the assistance to companies towards a successful restructuring that makes them fully autonomous, capable of being self-sustaining and supportive for their own community, thanks to the sustenance provided by virtuous operators – public and private; – the assistance to young people towards self-entrepreneurship, with the aim of forming generations with a critical spirit capable of grasping the needs of their own context and of approaching problems posed by the current economic model in a constructive manner, encouraging a sustainable transition and, above all, making them learn and, by learning, do.” (p. 61) “51. In the framework of the monitoring action foreseen in the present NAP, the following priorities are established: (i) undertake an up-to-date mapping of the national legal framework on corporate responsibility for human rights, any available remedies, and subsequently develop practical guidance; (ii) identify any gaps or barriers that prevent or render less than fully effective access to judicial remedies for victims of business-related abuse, especially with respect to extra-territorial violations, including on the basis of the relationship between primary and subsidiary companies; (iii) reconsider the introduction of legislative measures or the reform of those currently in force to strengthen access to an effective remedy in the fields of civil, criminal and administrative law.” (p. 68) “52. As part of the overall reform of the judicial system, raise awareness of: (i) remedies against the excessive length of civil proceedings; (ii) measures to strengthen specialized courts for companies, including by extending their jurisdiction to actions for consumer protection, unfair competition, misleading advertising; (iii) introduction of criminal law provisions against economic crimes, including those committed abroad.” (p. 68) The Italian NAP makes no explicit reference to land rights. “(…) the second Italian NAP-BHR intends to strengthen the application of the UNGPs through a series of complementary measures, referring in particular to the following guidelines: – the need to study in depth innovative issues related to technological development and artificial intelligence – also in relation to the Declaration of Rights in the Internet adopted by the Italian Parliament on 31 July 2015, in order to highlight their possible impact on the enjoyment of human rights, as well as an adequate action of corporate Due Diligence, and further innovative issues related to activities promoted by cultural companies with an important impact on the promotion of human rights” (p. 7) “The NAP addresses the issue of the negative impact of business activities on human rights and identifies specific commitments with the aim of effectively integrating the UNGPs into the national system and business activities and introduces limited objectives and actions, with reference to the national context translated into the following priorities: The promotion of corporate processes of Human Rights Due Diligence, aimed at identifying, preventing and mitigating potential risks, with particular attention to small and medium-sized enterprises” (p. 10) “1. Strengthening of the process to outline a regulatory framework for human rights due diligence, in accordance with international standards and developments in the EU, in order to identify, prevent and mitigate risks and manage eventual human rights violations by business companies. (…) 4. A collective awareness of the impact that new technologies, especially artificial intelligence, could have on the enjoyment of human rights, while paying attention to the promotion of corporate due diligence processes on human rights within the activities of those companies involved in research and development of new technologies.” (p. 11) “A more recent shift in 2020 has been recorded in the debate focused on the principle of Due Diligence in the supply chain, which is considered fundamental for companies wishing to carry out sustainable production activities that respect human rights.” (p. 12) “Italy has domestically transposed Directive (EU) 2014/95 on non-financial reporting through Legislative Decree No. 254/2016 and, in this context, an important inspection and verification activity by CONSOB of non-financial reporting is being conducted. Its ultimate aim is to verify adequate and transparent information along the supply chain, and also on processes of Due Diligence and management of the risk of violation of human and labour rights along the supply chain.” (p. 34) “Italy has followed the above-mentioned process and will continue to provide its contribution to the international debate, taking into proper consideration not only potential risks depending upon lack of Due Diligence but also the factual impact of business conduct stemming from a scarce Due Diligence.” (p. 44) “(…) the Committee has received and submitted to the attention of the GLIDU, an “open letter” addressed to institutions by academia on the issue of Due Diligence, in the perspective of the synergic relationship between business and human rights.” (p. 45) “The strategic role of public agencies (in Italy SACE and SIMEST, with reference also to the Cassa Depositi e Prestiti – CdP system) makes them more exposed to the risk of being associated or directly linked to human rights violations: both agencies have integrated the OECD Common Approaches and carry out a Due Diligence analysis on the potential social and environmental impacts of their operations. In the management of financial instruments of development cooperation, with particular regard – but not limited to – facilities to Italian companies participating in joint ventures in partner countries (…)” (p. 51) “Italy has performed best practices through awareness campaigns and training activities in line with the OECD Guidelines on Due Diligence, as well as the relevant EU regulations. In addition, again with reference to responsible trade in minerals, Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council was adopted in 2017. This established supply chain Due Diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold, originating in conflict or high-risk zones. It has been transposed into Italian law through Legislative Decree No. 13 of 2 February 2021, which establishes Due Diligence obligations in the supply chain for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold, originating in conflict or high-risk areas.” (p. 52) “15. Conduct a systematic review of the legislative system in accordance with international standards on Due Diligence of companies.” (p. 63) “26. Promote the dissemination of EU and international Due Diligence standards to businesses.” (p. 66) “32. Participate in relevant OECD, European Union and other international initiatives on sustainable supply chains, human rights and Due Diligence.” (p. 66) “34. Through new mechanisms of monitoring and recognition of business activities, provide for an analysis of the Due Diligence of public or state-controlled companies, including non-financial reporting.” (p. 66) “37. Fully implement Regulation (EU) 2017/821 establishing supply chain Due Diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold, originating in conflict or high-risk areas.” (p. 67) “38. Further promote awareness of the OECD Guides on Due Diligence for Companies Operating in Weak Governance Zones (the “Risk Awareness Tool for Multinational Companies in Weak Governance Zones” and the “Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas”).” (p. 67) “44. Support initiatives in all major international systems with the aim of developing tools to promote and strengthen ‘fair competition’ for the promotion and protection of human rights, including through the use of Due Diligence mechanisms, and foster the exchange of experiences with partner countries, both at European and international level, and with international organizations such as the United Nations, UNECE, OECD, ILO, UNICEF, IOM and the European Union.” (p. 67) “48. Disseminate principles adopted in relation to emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence for human rights compliance with a Due Diligence approach.” (p. 68) “50. Contribute, through exchange with governments and social partners, to good practices and common strategies to support the application of Due Diligence mechanisms in the debate on “Decent Work in the Global Supply Chain” promoted by ILO.” (p. 68) “the second Italian NAP-BHR intends to strengthen the application of the UNGPs through a series of complementary measures, referring in particular to the following guidelines: – the commitment to update and improve collective action in relation to multiple human rights issues from the perspective of protecting the ‘most vulnerable’ (women and girls, minors, persons with disabilities, LGBTIQ+ persons, migrants and asylum seekers, persons belonging to ethnic and religious minorities, the elderly), with the aim to empower their role and involvement as right-holders, where individual aspects related to business activities may have a significant impact on these categories from a labour and economic point of view” (p. 7) “The NAP addresses the issue of the negative impact of business activities on human rights and identifies specific commitments with the aim of effectively integrating the UNGPs into the national system and business activities and introduces limited objectives and actions, with reference to the national context translated into the following priorities: The fight against caporalato (especially in the agricultural and construction sectors) and forms of exploitation, forced labour, child labour, slavery and irregular work, with particular attention to migrants and victims of trafficking” (p. 10) “interventions for the protection and integration of migrant workers will be reinforced, in line with former actions in 2020, within the framework of the Steering Committee as well as the Three-year Plan to combat illegal labour. To this end experience and significant results have been achieved during inspections carried out by the extraordinary task forces organized in implementing the two projects financed with EU and national funds (“SU.PR.EME.” and “A.L.T. Caporalato!”), the Ministry and inspection staff being assisted by cultural mediators from the International Organisation for Migration (IOM). The promotion and enhancement of synergies between territorial Labour Inspectorates, Public Safety Authorities, Public Prosecutors’ Offices, Police Forces, Social Partners and Associations on the territory, jointly committed on several fronts (prevention, assistance, protection, repression) will also be promoted to strengthen the protection of victims, foster cooperation and increase trust in the institutions.” (p. 21) “Contacts were made with the IOM referents of each regional context and with the bodies and associations of the anti-trafficking network in territories involved to ensure timeliness and effectiveness of any interventions to take charge of and provide protection to victims of severe exploitation identified during the operations.” (p. 22) “the INL has carried out and coordinated extraordinary surveillance campaigns in some areas of Southern Italy (in the agricultural sector only, with the project Su.Pr.Eme (funded by the EU Commission and supported by the project PIU’ SU.PRE.ME, for an amount of about € 50 million for the implementation of interventions in Puglia, Campania, Basilicata, Calabria and Sicily) and Central Italy (mainly, but not only in agriculture, with the project A.L.T. Caporalato! project, financed by the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies for an amount of € 3 million for actions in the territories of central and northern Italy), where the phenomena of forced labour and labour exploitation of migrants are particularly diffused.” (p. 22) The National Plan of Action against Trafficking and Serious Exploitation of Human Beings 2016-2018, implementing Directive (EU) 2011/36, is aimed at defining measures and intervention strategies for preventing and combating the phenomenon, as well as actions aimed at raising awareness, social prevention, emersion and social integration of victims. The Plan was articulated according to the following five key priorities: (a) identify, protect and assist trafficking victims; (b) intensify prevention of human trafficking; (c) strengthen prosecution of traffickers; (d) improve policy coordination and coherence among key stakeholders; and (e) increase knowledge of emerging issues related to all forms of human trafficking and provide an effective response. Given the complexity and multi-sectoral nature of the interventions, the Plan has provided for the establishment of a political-institutional Steering Committee, responsible for ensuring a multidisciplinary and integrated approach between institutional and private/social actors. It is flanked by a Technical Committee, composed of representatives of central and local government, law enforcement agencies, trade unions and third sector entities involved in the fight against human trafficking. Moreover, the Department for Equal Opportunities at the Presidency of the Council of Ministers is responsible for the data collection system SIRIT (Sistema Informatizzato per la raccolta di informazioni sulla tratta), managed and updated by the Veneto Region within the framework of the Agreement for the management of the service inherent in the “Antitrafficking toll-free number” Given the persistence of the Covid-19 health emergency, the Department for Equal Opportunities introduced proper changes for public and private operators in charge of anti-trafficking projects. Taking into account the dynamics of trafficking in relation to confinement measures, the Department ensured the ongoing implementation of projects and by an ad hoc provision of 28 May 2020 established their extension until 31 December 2020, with a 7-months paid allowance worth over € 11 million. This approach was reiterated in order to further extend the anti-trafficking projects until 30 June 2021, while providing additional funding of approximately € 10 million. In 2021 the Department for Equal Opportunities has prepared a new call (Call No. 4/2021): it takes into account the changes some services have provided during the pandemic, but it will also be structured in such a way to respond to needs of operators. In 2020, the process aimed at drawing up the new Plan was started; to this end, both the Steering Committee and the Technical Committee were reconvened, within which 4 working tables were identified according to the four key directions prevention, prosecution, protection, partnership and cooperation. The opportunity to set up an ad hoc working group involving all the competent Administrations with the aim of strengthening the collaboration for data collection was shared. In particular, the new Plan will be based on the following key priorities: (a) improve the reliability and availability of data on trafficking, as a precondition for adequate monitoring of the phenomenon and better policy-making; (b) intensify actions to address trafficking for sexual exploitation, forced marriages, begging, forced crime, organ trafficking, sale of infants, all forms of labour exploitation; (c) address trafficking in the new context of the migration crisis (in fact, many victims of trafficking are involved in asylum application systems); (d) intensify the training of professionals who, in various capacities, have contact with victims, also in relation to the evolution of traffickers’ operational methods; (e) combat impunity for those who knowingly use trafficked persons; (f) strengthen efforts to prevent child trafficking for multiple exploitation purposes; (g) take further measures to improve the identification of trafficked persons; (h) facilitate and ensure access to compensation for trafficked persons; (i) continue to take measures to ensure that the return of trafficked persons is carried out with respect for their rights, safety and dignity and, with regard to children, in full compliance with the principle of the best interests of the child; (l) enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of investigation and prosecution activities. In the field of labour and social legislation, in the implementation of priorities of intervention provided in planning documents for surveillance activity, extraordinary inspection campaigns were launched to prevent and counteract the illegal phenomena of greatest social alarm. These include caporalato, and the exploitation of foreign citizens and their reduction to slavery through controls over production sectors and geographical areas most at risk, in close collaboration with enforcement law officers (Carabinieri, ASL, Guardia di Finanza, State Police). Although the prevention of contemporary forms of slavery and the protection of victims cannot disregard the fight against illegal phenomena and the restoration of legality, the most demanding challenge concerns the direct involvement of workers. This is especially in regard to those most exposed to the risk of abuse and oppression: they should be involved in training courses to know their fundamental rights, for a greater awareness of defense tools provided and encourage a relationship of trust with the institutions. It should also be noted that, if during supervisory activities the presence of illegally employed irregular foreign workers is ascertained, the inspection staff is required to fill out and deliver a form to inform the foreign worker of his/her right to unpaid wages and insurance and social security contributions and how to enforce this right, as well as to sanction and take restrictive measures against involved employers.” (p. 25) “The violation of rules relating to the exploitation of child labour and other forms of trafficking in human beings, as defined by Legislative Decree No. 24 of 4 March 2014, constitutes for the company exclusion from procedures concerning public contracts, as provided for in Art. 80, paragraph 1) – letter f), of the Public Contracts Code.” (p. 48) “6. Ensure full implementation of the National Action Plan against Trafficking and Serious Exploitation of Human Beings” (p. 62) “42. Preparation – by and/or in collaboration with the Inter-ministerial Committee for Human Rights – of spaces and activities for awareness raising and training on human rights and business (with particular attention to the so-called vulnerable categories (women, minors, persons with disabilities, LGBTIQ+ persons, minorities, migrants, etc.) designed as tools for support to businesses and public officials. These tools may consist in the preparation of governmental webpages to host dedicated information material, as well as in the development of campaigns, surveys, e-learning modules and ad hoc seminars. The latter will be defined in relation to specific competences and activities of each Ministry, as well as in constant dialogue with local authorities and all stakeholders who wish to take part in these initiatives.” (p. 67) “54. Ensure an adequate level of resources dedicated to legal aid, and ensure access to free legal aid also for non-resident foreign nationals, in particular for irregular migrants who are victims of crimes committed by criminal organizations, such as trafficking in human beings, and enable them to report such crimes regardless of their status.” (p. 68) “Italy intends to continue to ensure the highest level of protection of human rights from a legislative and operational perspective. To this end it is necessary: – in agreement with parliamentary authorities, support the process for establishing an independent national human rights institution in accordance with the Paris Principles of 1993” “58. The provision of mechanisms for coordination and cooperation with many ombudsmen active at local and national level, in order to raise their awareness in the activities of protection and advocacy against human rights abuses by businesses;” (p. 69) “In structural terms, two main challenges have been the creation of an NHRI and a national network on BHR, also to favour the institutionalization of ad hoc spaces for consultation, comparison and participation.” (p. 71) Read more about National Human Rights Institutions/ Ombudspersons “The renewed and dynamic entrepreneurial approach is based on corporate governance structures to overcoming short-term financial advantages for environmental, social and human sustainability in the medium and long term in the context of the European Union’s initiatives on the circular economy, biodiversity and sustainable financial growth. At the same time, corporate governance was consolidated through the implementation of Directive (EU) 2014/85 on non-financial reporting, so relevant today. Its revision is in pipeline with the challenges posed by the pandemic and mentioned in the Communications on the European Green Deal and on “Europe’s moment: Repair and Prepare for the Next Generation” for a business vision of the opportunities for economic recovery in the long term.” (p. 12) “Italy has domestically transposed Directive (EU) 2014/95 on non-financial reporting through Legislative Decree No. 254/2016 and, in this context, an important inspection and verification activity by CONSOB of non-financial reporting is being conducted. Its ultimate aim is to verify adequate and transparent information along the supply chain, and also on processes of Due Diligence and management of the risk of violation of human and labour rights along the supply chain.” (p. 34) “16. Further promote an effective implementation of Legislative Decree No. 254/2016 implementing Directive (EU) 2014/95 on the disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by large companies and groups of companies, including through a benchmarking exercise carried out on a sample of companies and aimed at analyzing the effective inclusion of the human rights dimension in non-financial reports published by companies and supervised by CONSOB, including in relation to diversity and gender.” (p. 63) “34. through new mechanisms of monitoring and recognition of business activities, provide for an analysis of the Due Diligence of public or state-controlled companies, including non-financial reporting” (p. 66) “35. continuing the promotion and protection of human rights, with a proactive role of the Inter-ministerial Committee for Human Rights, in correlation with the priority lines introduced in the framework of the PNRR and the SNSVS, including – among others – issues such as anti-corruption, non-financial information disclosure , supply chain, environmental issues, decent work and non-discrimination in favour of competing companies in public calls for tender and within contracts stipulated with companies for the purchase of goods and services, with particular regard to (i) Italian companies operating abroad; (ii) Italian companies using foreign suppliers; (iii) foreign companies” (p. 66)” “It has been deemed necessary to ensure the accompaniment of companies in their growth on issues such as social value and sustainability, for example by enlarging the number of companies that have voluntarily published non-financial information in their financial statements and encouraging them to adopt new communication approaches regarding ecological footprint of their products and production processes.” (p. 70) “The creation of remedial mechanisms – in terms of operational frameworks and procedures – to ensure access to justice for victims of human rights violations, as a result of the implementation of productive activities by companies, is one of the core goals of the UN ‘Accountability and Remedy’ project. Italy has participated in this project, reporting the introduction of legislative measures aimed at this purpose and at facilitating even corporate structures for the introduction of remedial mechanisms-models, referring to multiple legal disciplines (contracts, competition, arbitration, labour law, consumer law, environmental law, privacy, nondiscrimination and legislative measures for equality, protection of freedom of information and protection of whistle-blowers). Within the Italian framework, several non-judicial mechanisms coexist, placed within the institutional framework or functionally connected to it, with a divergent mandate and impact from the decision-making point of view. These are placed side by side to the judicial system and are characterized by structural and operational features that are easier and more accessible as well as less expensive and faster, while granting independence and effectiveness.” (p. 56) “21. Reaffirm as a priority the elimination of all forms of exploitation of child labour in Italy and with reference to the economic activities of Italian companies abroad, as provided for by the relevant ILO Conventions; to this end, encourage the dissemination among companies of initiatives aimed at increasing attention on impacts of business activities on children’s rights and on the need for the inclusion of adequate remedies and mitigation measures as per the risk of violation of such rights. The inclusion of children’s rights in business practices includes: the provision of “family friendly policies” designed to support workers in their role as parents/caregivers (smart working, paid parental leave, social protection and adequate wages for all); the introduction of measures to monitor the presence of minors in the workplace; the adoption of Child Safeguarding Policies/Codes of Conduct to foresee, report and take charge of potential risk situations for minors who come into contact with the company; the provision of security guarantees for digital environment (data protection, access to age-appropriate content, privacy protection).” (p. 64) “In line with operational instruments already described in the first NAP, and which are still in force, provide for the following actions concerning non-judicial mechanisms for denouncing human rights violations by companies: 55. The introduction of the issue of human rights violations by companies in the mandate of the Independent National Commission on Human Rights;” (p. 68) “57. The launch, also through the diplomatic and consular network and with the involvement of the Italian Chambers of Commerce abroad, of awareness campaigns on non-judicial complaint mechanisms, in collaboration with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation;” (p. 69) “59. With reference to the ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) model, raise awareness of it through training for citizens and professionals.” (p. 69) “Italy reaffirms the commitment made by signing the OECD Declaration for International Investors and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Companies in promoting the standards of conduct expected in many areas, including human rights.” (p. 15) “In the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the Guidelines for Multinational Companies introduced Due Diligence, requiring business companies, apart from their territorial performance, to voluntarily integrate into their decisionmaking and risk management systems a process that allows them to identify, prevent and mitigate their impact – primarily on human rights – and to account for their approach. The establishment of the network of National Contact Points for Responsible Business Conduct has provided for monitoring the conduct of business activities to ensuring the effective implementation of the Guidelines, including Due Diligence throughout the supply chain. (…) Italy has followed the above-mentioned process and will continue to provide its contribution to the international debate, taking into proper consideration not only potential risks depending upon lack of Due Diligence but also the factual impact of business conduct stemming from a scarce Due Diligence.” (p. 44) “Within the Italian framework, several non-judicial mechanisms coexist, placed within the institutional framework or functionally connected to it, with a divergent mandate and impact from the decision-making point of view. These are placed side by side to the judicial system and are characterized by structural and operational features that are easier and more accessible as well as less expensive and faster, while granting independence and effectiveness. This category includes the National Contact Point (NCP) in charge of promoting the widest implementation of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises by Italian companies of all sizes and sectors. The Italian NCP was established in 2002 under Art. 39 of Law No. 273/2002, and is located at the Ministry of Economic Development – Division VI of the Directorate General for Industrial Policy, Innovation and Small and Medium Enterprises. (…) According to the OECD database, the chapters of the Guidelines most affected by Instances to the Italian NCP are: “General principles” and “Human rights” on an equal footing, “Disclosure of information”; and “Employment and industrial relations” (…) As to the use of the Government’s economic leverage to ensure that companies follow the recommendations by the NCP, this goes beyond the OECD Guidelines which only encourage NCPs to “inform governmental agencies of their statements and reports when they are known by the NCP to be relevant to a specific agency’s policies and programmes”. Nevertheless, the NCP signed a MoU with SACE to exchange information informally so that they could coordinate their tasks and policies. The Italian NCP also recently created a new sub-group for specific work on COVID-19 and Responsible Business Conduct” (p. 56) “25. With regard to the OECD Guidelines and National Contact Point, Italy undertakes to: i) consolidate the promotion of compliance with the UNGPs by companies operating abroad, through an information tool for the diplomatic/consular network, in collaboration with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation; ii) implement the OECD Guidelines through their promotion among companies with particular regard to human rights dimension, and consolidate the constant dialogue with companies, trade unions, NGOs and representatives of civil society.” (p. 65) “28. Develop guidelines for companies (with particular regard to SMEs) and guidance tools related to different productive sectors, in line with the activity aimed at disseminating guidance tools developed by the OECD, the European Union and other international organizations (IOM).” (p. 66) “32. Participate in relevant OECD, European Union and other international initiatives on sustainable supply chains, human rights and Due Diligence.” (p. 66) “33. Promote the OECD document “COVID-19 and Responsible Business Conduct”, in line with Italy’s adherence to the Joint Statement in support of the full development of NCP skills, the Business at OECD (BIAC), OECD Watch and TUAC and the call launched in May 2020 for the implementation of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Companies.” (p. 66) “38. Further promote awareness of the OECD Guides on Due Diligence for Companies Operating in Weak Governance Zones (the “Risk Awareness Tool for Multinational Companies in Weak Governance Zones” and the “Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas”)” (p. 67) “56. Renewed and broader information, especially for stakeholders as victims, of the mechanism of ‘Specific Instances’ to the NCP, in relation to alleged human rights violations by companies.” (p. 69) “the second Italian NAP-BHR intends to strengthen the application of the UNGPs through a series of complementary measures, referring in particular to the following guidelines: – the commitment to update and improve collective action in relation to multiple human rights issues from the perspective of protecting the ‘most vulnerable’ (women and girls, minors, persons with disabilities, LGBTIQ+ persons, migrants and asylum seekers, persons belonging to ethnic and religious minorities, the elderly), with the aim to empower their role and involvement as right-holders, where individual aspects related to business activities may have a significant impact on these categories from a labour and economic point of view.” (p. 7) “the following national priorities of the second National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights are formulated: 5. Strengthening of measures to prevent and combat all forms of exploitation in the labour sector, both public and private, infering vulnerable groups as victims, with particular reference to women, minors, persons with disabilities and lgbtiq+ people” (p. 11) “Within the Italian legal system, Law No. 68/1999 is the main national legislation aimed at promoting the insertion and labour integration of persons with disabilities into the labour sector through supporting services for targeted placement. For data collection and monitoring, pursuant to Art. 21 of the aforementioned Law, the Minister of Labour and Social Policies submits to the Parliament every two years a report on the state of implementation of Law No. 68/1999, based on regional data. In fact, Regions and Autonomous Provinces are entrusted with the operational management of services for the integration of persons with disabilities, while the coordination of management is charged by the National Agency for Active Labour Policies (ANPAL). In the 9th Report to Parliament on the state of implementation of Law No. 68/1999, covering the three-year period 2016-2018 and carried out in collaboration with the National Institute for the Analysis of Public Policies (INAPP), data relating to the performance of the labour market of persons with disabilities are provided. The Report shows an employment growth throughout the national territory, accompanied by still diffused infrastructural gaps, but governance systems able to achieve good results when approaching the problem through models of integration of services and financial resources. (…) Persons with disabilities placed in the labour market with public and private employers reported in 2016 were 28,412; they became 34,613 in 2017 and 39,229 in 2018. The private sector absorbs 96% of the total in the full three-year period. These numbers testify the engagement of the system, also considering the simplification of processes introduced: Legislative Decree No. 151/2015, which requires private employers, who employ 15 to 35 employees, to hire a worker with disability. This obligation came into force in 2018, while previously it arose only in the case of new hires. (…) Among the tasks of the National Observatory the preparation of the two-year Action Programme for the promotion of the rights and integration of persons with disabilities is foreseen. On July 10, 2019, the “Document of Proposals for the Activities of the National Observatory on the Condition of Persons with Disabilities” was published, prepared by the Scientific Technical Committee and divided into 9 thematic areas and 13 working groups. The main objectives are: – establish an effective coordination mechanism among all ministries and public agencies that allows for the application of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in all areas of governmental competence; – select a number of actions, within the second two-year action programme for the promotion of the rights and integration of people with disabilities, to be reasonably achievable during the period of the Centre’s activity; – coordinate the implementation of the second two-year programme, the Concluding Observations of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the contents of the Disability Code, on the basis of commitment contained in the PNRR, by initiating a number of actions for the effective implementation of the aforementioned United Nations Convention. About relevant government policies to improve the participation of persons with disabilities in the workforce, it should be noted that Legislative Decree No. 151/2015 introduced some provisions aimed at rationalizing and revising the procedures and fulfilments of targeted insertion of persons referred to Law No. 68/1999 and other subjects entitled to compulsory placement, in order to promote social inclusion, placing and integration into the labour market and taking care of skills of persons with disabilities. In particular, the adoption of specific guidelines on the targeted placement of persons with disabilities envisages to promote: – an integrated network among social, health, educational and training services on the territory, as well as with INAIL for the accompaniment and support of the person with disabilities taken in charge; – territorial agreements with trade unions of workers and employers that are more representative on a national level, social cooperatives referred to in Law No. 381/1991, associations of persons with disabilities and their families, as well as with other third sector organizations; – bio-psycho-social assessment of the condition of disability; – job analysis and reasonable accommodation; – the creation of the role of the responsible for job placement; – good practices of job inclusion. Among the Italian national policies aimed at promoting the employment of persons with more severe disabilities, there are incentives for employers who hire workers with disabilities, financed through the Fund for the right to work of the persons with disabilities, established by Art. 13, paragraph 4, of Law No. 68/1999, at the Ministry of Labour. Employers are granted an incentive in relation to taxable gross salary for social security purposes, which varies according to the degree and type of working capacity reduction of the hired person. The duration of the contributory benefit also varies according to the characteristics of the hired worker and the type of employment relationship. (…) In particular, for employers who hire persons with disabilities for an indefinite employment contract there are incentives for 36 months for the recruitment of workers with a reduction in working capacity from 67% (the incentive is equal to 35% of the gross monthly salary); the incentive rises to 70% for the hiring of persons with a reduction in working capacity of more than 79%. The incentives are also provided (in the amount of 70% of the gross monthly salary) for a longer period of time (60 months), for the recruitment of workers with intellectual and mental disabilities. These workers are also encouraged to have fixed-term hiring of not less than twelve months.” (p. 26) “With reference to the need to draw attention to impacts of business activity on family life and children’s rights, the Department for Family Policies published the new public call “#Conciliamo”, amounting to € 74 million, on 8 November 2019 for family-work reconciliation projects by companies, networks and groups of associated or controlled companies. Available funds will be used for interventions that promote a welfare tailored to families and to improve the quality of life of working mothers and fathers. The call has several specific objectives: the demographic revival, increase in female employment, rebalancing of workloads between men and women, support for families with relatives with disabilities, health protection, combating the abandonment of the elderly.” “7. Fully implement the provisions contained in the new legislation on Development Cooperation, with particular focus on the relationship between for-profit and not-for-profit actors and promote the widest knowledge among companies of the Guidelines on Childhood and Adolescence, the Cooperation Guidelines on Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women, Girls and Children (2020-2024) and the Guidelines on Disability and Social Inclusion in Cooperation Interventions.” (p. 62) “8. Continue to implement the provisions contained in the Second Disability Action Programme, with particular reference to line 5 “Labour and Employment” and to provisions concerning the definition of support measures and a system of incentives for first and second level bargaining over flexibility, part-time work and work-life balance for persons with disabilities or serious and chronic progressive illnesses or caregivers of persons with serious disabilities.” (p. 62) “9. Promote the employment inclusion of persons with disabilities with attention to persons with disabilities with more severe disabling conditions.” (p. 62) “10. Consolidate respect for the fundamental rights of people with disabilities in line with international conventional standards in relation to access to and quality of hospital care through the promotion and dissemination of the “Charter of Rights of People with Disabilities in Hospital” created by the Coop. Sociale Onlus Spes contra Spem in 2010.” (p. 62) “42. Preparation – by and/or in collaboration with the Inter-ministerial Committee for Human Rights – of spaces and activities for awareness raising and training on human rights and business (with particular attention to the so-called vulnerable categories (women, minors, persons with disabilities, LGBTIQ+ persons, minorities, migrants, etc.) designed as tools for support to businesses and public officials. These tools may consist in the preparation of governmental webpages to host dedicated information material, as well as in the development of campaigns, surveys, e-learning modules and ad hoc seminars. The latter will be defined in relation to specific competences and activities of each Ministry, as well as in constant dialogue with local authorities and all stakeholders who wish to take part in these initiatives” (p. 67) “The National Plan of Action against Trafficking and Serious Exploitation of Human Beings 2016-2018, implementing Directive (EU) 2011/36, is aimed at defining measures and intervention strategies for preventing and combating the phenomenon, as well as actions aimed at raising awareness, social prevention, emersion and social integration of victims. The Plan was articulated according to the following five key priorities: (d) improve policy coordination and coherence among key stakeholders” (p. 24) “The Italian Agency for Development Cooperation, under the direction and supervision of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of International Cooperation, has the task of implementing cooperation policies. The coherence of national policies is ensured through the Inter-ministerial Committee on Development Cooperation (CICS), chaired by the President of the Council of Ministers and composed of representatives of the main Ministries. Law No. 125/14 also provided for the establishment of a National Council for Development Cooperation, whose members include the main public and private actors, civil society organizations and other nonprofit and for-profit entities operating in the field of international development cooperation.” (p. 25) “Two key initiatives are planned to be concluded in 2021: the triennial review process of the SNSvS and the compilation of the National Action Plan on Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development (PCSD). Both these initiatives entail large participation of civil society, scientific institutions and local actors.” (p. 36) “With reference to the adoption of National Plans and Strategies, in coherence with the European indications, UNAR started consultation processes involving administrations at central, regional and local level and third sector representatives for the elaboration of the following documents: – the National LGBTI Strategy; – the National Plan against Racism, Xenophobia and Intolerance; – the National Strategy for the Inclusion of Roma, Sinti and Caminanti.” (p. 41) “Today the implementation of the UNGPs requires an enhanced commitment compared to the previous decade. It demands to operate in line with guidelines, results achieved and examined, and criticalities and challenges posed to States and companies in the framework set up by the UN BHR Working Group. This engagement is aimed to achieve an even more impacting action until 2030, involving all actors concerned and ensuring coherence between legislative and administrative measures, policies and programmatic and operational tools for the promotion of human rights.” (p. 59) The Italian NAP makes no explicit reference to privatisation. “The Ministry for Ecological Transition is in charge for monitoring implementation of legislative decrees enforcing the ‘Circular Economy Package’ and preparation of corrective decrees; National Action Plan for the environmental sustainability of consumption in the Public Administration will be defined to maximize green public procurement (…)” (p. 35) “In relation to environmental sustainability in the Public Administration, a first step in this direction was the “Guide for the integration of social aspects in public procurement”, adopted by the aforementioned Ministry by Ministerial Decree of June 6, 2012, as part of the National Action Plan on Green Public Procurement (PANGPP) (…) The Guide aims to provide operational guidance on how to take social aspects into account in the definition of public tenders relating to supply, service and works contracts. It considers experiences of integrating social criteria in public procurement developed by different EU countries.” (p. 37) “In addition, Legislative Decree No. 50 of 19 April 2016 in transposing EU Directives 23, 24 and 25/2014, outlines a regulatory framework for social and environmental responsibility in the management of public procurement, including the possibility of introducing criteria relating also to human rights within the contract life cycle (definition of the subject of the contract, criteria for selection of candidates, technical specifications, award criteria and contract performance clauses). The EU Commission has recently published a second edition of the guide for socially sustainable procurement (“Buying Social – A guide to taking account of social considerations in public procurement” – Second edition (2021/C 237/01)), referred to in the previous NAP BHR. It has provided indications to identify a set of clauses that will be included by ANAC in the Standard Notice for e-procurement. (…) To this scope a full life-cycle monitoring through the National Database of Public Contracts, managed by ANAC, will be facilitated by the adoption of the new models covered by Regulation (EU) 1780 of 2019, which will be fully operational in October 2023. In collaboration with other administrations concerned for adoption of models and adaptation to national requirements, ANAC will give right emphasis identification processes over social and environmental sustainability clauses in calls for tenders and compliance with them throughout the life cycle of the contract (…)” (p. 38) “Italy fully adheres to the principle of socially responsible procurement and is committed to ensuring that respect for human rights is taken into account at all procurement stages. Legislative Decree No. 50/2016 (Public Contracts Code) has transposed 2014 EU Directives in force in this field: basic principles are aimed at guaranteeing access to and the conduct of decent work, respect for social and labour rights, as far as SMEs’ participation in public contracts. In the framework of the BHR NAP 2016-2021, in the field of public procurement ANAC has provided operational guidance to administrations to introduce social and environmental criteria in contractual activities of public administrations through the Guidelines on the Economically Most Advantageous Offer (Guidelines 2 of 2 May 2018 https://www.anticorruzione.it/-/linee-guida-n.-2). In the framework of the PNRR, the role of the Public Contracts Database and the Single Transparency Platform managed by ANAC is set to gain importance also to facilitating the involvement of civil society in the control on legality and life cycle approach in public procurement through available digital tools. The Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport publishes on its website calls for tenders for public infrastructure contracts, as well as the notice of award. In line with Global Standard of Contracting 5 (C5) and other supranational best practices, “Opencantieri” project has been set up: it is an online platform that includes open, complete and updated information on public infrastructure processes. Contracts related to infrastructure development owe their standards of integrity and transparency also to Consip, the national Central Purchasing Body (CPB) at the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF). Its mission is to make the use of public resources more efficient and transparent, while at the same time providing tools and expertise to public administrations and strengthening competition among businesses. Consip has granted a greater and easier access to data and information on its activities, providing useful tools to clearly understand and correctly interpret data, as well as a geo-referencing system that, using interactive maps, allows to consult data on purchases. In order to make the sharing of data and information understandable and systematic, Consip published its second Sustainability Report, with the aim of describing its mandate and contribution to the national public procurement system. In order to ensure a clear and complete accounting of its actions, the Report was drafted according to GRI standards. It describes Consip’s operations and performance in terms of environmental, economic and social sustainability, noting how this approach has contributed to the achievement of some SDGs. The raising of standards of integrity and transparency in the development of infrastructures is also guaranteed through the dissemination of Legality Protocols: these are voluntary agreements between the Prefecture or other Public Security Authorities and public or private companies involved in the management of public works, which have proved particularly useful in combating criminal infiltration. The role of such protocols has recently been strengthened through regulatory interventions (Decree Law No. 76/2020 converted into Law No. 120/2020, added to Legislative Decree No. 159/2011 – Antimafia Code – Art. 83-bis on the subject of “legality protocols”), which give contracting stations the possibility to assess in notices, calls for tenders or letters of invitation that failure to comply with the legality protocols as a cause for exclusion from the tender or termination of the contract. In order to raise the level of transparency and encourage virtuous mechanisms of larger control over public procurement by citizens and civil society, the ANAC has made available through an Open Data portal all information contained in the National Database of Public Contracts. These data concern both tender procedures and execution of contracts. In addition, ANAC has made available on its website a platform for the processing of these data by citizens and users. In addition, ANAC is working with other stakeholders in the project “Measuring the risk of corruption at territorial level and promoting transparency” (funded by the National Operational Programme Governance and Institutional Capacity 2014-2020 – ERDF, ASSE 3 – Specific Objective 3.1 Action 3.1.4), to identify quantitative indicators of the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures implemented by the administrations (so-called contrast indicators). The project also intends to create inter-institutional collaboration networks to guarantee transparency in every sector of the Public Administration. The intent is to raise awareness of the private sector, academia and civil society on the need to overcome the current approach, based on exclusively subjective corruption indicators, and to promote a further approach to measuring corruption, based on reliable data in line with the principle of “leading by example”. As suggested by the OECD “investing in improving data quality to enhance risk assessments can provide a context for organizations to address broader issues along the value chain, improving the use of data within decision-making processes” (OECD, 2019).” (p.48) The Italian NAP makes no explicit reference to the security sector. “The Ministry of Justice has recently set up a working group with the CNPDS (National Centre for Prevention and Social Defence Foundation), Confindustria and Assonime. The aim is to measure the effectiveness and consistency of regulations on administrative liability for crimes of collective entities within the country. and to assess the appropriateness of any reforming measures. In particular, the working group intends to propose solutions to remedy the following critical aspects of the current legislation: – insufficient focus on the size and organizational complexity of companies covered by Legislative Decree No. 231/2001, with particular reference to small and medium-sized companies, as well as public bodies (…)” (p. 17) “2. Update the implementation assessment information of Legislative Decree No. 231/2001 in order to evaluate its extension in terms of objectives and application of the administrative liability of legal persons, and to pursue the following objectives in this area: – the fight against the crisis and the rate of unemployment suffered by economic sectors most affected by measures to counter the epidemic emergency (catering and the gastronomic sector; tourism/hotel sector; small businesses/individuals in the craft and retail sectors of Made in Italy)” (p. 61) “29. Promote and encourage multi-stakeholder initiatives involving large as well as small and medium-sized companies in order to facilitate the exchange of information and good practices on business and human rights, moving from a general mapping over companies endorsing the UNGPs and operating in accordance with international standards.” (p. 66) “To this end Italy renews its commitment to ensure that companies controlled or participated in by the State, companies that are supported or have access to governmental benefits, companies that contract or conclude trade transactions with the State, carry out their production activities in compliance with international and European standards, both binding and non-binding, and of related national legislative measures to implement these standards for a full and concrete protection of human rights along the whole supply chain.” (p. 48) Read more about State Owned Enterprises/ Public Private Partnerships “In more recent times, BHR issues have experienced new criticalities, especially with respect to the accessibility and use of remedial mechanisms. These criticalities are related to companies’ and stations’ responsibilities along the global supply chain and the space without physical boundaries proper of digital technologies. (…) A particular attention to BHR issues has been introduced in the Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy 2020-2024, in the perspective of a wider process for the elaboration of a comprehensive EU framework dedicated to the implementation of the UNGPs. In the aforementioned document, the institutions commit themselves to conducting a dialogue with businesses in order to increase the level of protection and promotion of human rights, with the aim of combating corruption and introducing good practices in the area of corporate social responsibility, Due Diligence, accountability and access to remedy, and to fostering contacts and exchanges between businesses and civil society also in the area of women’s empowerment, sustainable development and decent work. This is in addition to strengthening their commitment at the multilateral level and in the development of new tools and materials to advance understanding on these issues. In this approach, the role of the institutions is crucial in terms of comparison and horizontal collaboration both internally (at the central level and in the European Delegations) and externally (with development banks and international financial institutions) and in the dialogue with Member States. The institutions consider a targeted business action to ensure the protection of human rights in the labour market, along the supply chain, and in the context of relevant challenges posed by digital technologies.” (p. 9) “2. The promotion of fundamental rights through business activities both offline and online along the supply chain, at local, national, regional and global level.” (p. 11) “Italy renews its commitment for an open and constructive dialogue with businesses of all sizes who operate at different levels and in multiple sectoral areas. So far they could ensure respect for human rights in their structures, in planning and implementation of their development and economic growth strategies along the whole supply chain, as enshrined in the main binding and non-binding international legal instruments. “In relation to the agricultural sector along a wider perspective, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Forestry Policies , through the provision of incentives in the agro-food sector, promotes interventions for a better distribution of value along the supply chain with the aim̀ of guaranteeing producers adequate remuneration. The Ministry intends to support and develop potential̀ of rural areas throughout Italy, also through the implementation of the National Rural Development Programme, co-financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD). This programme is implemented at the regional level through Rural Development Plans (RDP).” (p. 20) “Italy has domestically transposed Directive (EU) 2014/95 on non-financial reporting through Legislative Decree No. 254/2016 and, in this context, an important inspection and verification activity by CONSOB of non-financial reporting is being conducted. Its ultimate aim is to verify adequate and transparent information along the supply chain, and also on processes of Due Diligence and management of the risk of violation of human and labour rights along the supply chain.” (p. 34) “In the context of the European Action Plan for the Circular Economy, the Government, through dialogue with local authorities and constant consultation of public and private operators and trade associations – intends to develop technical and administrative tools to ensure the support and development of coherent supply chains according to an approach of economic circularity.” (p. 35) “The implementation of Green Public Procurement has also the purpose to develop circular supply chains, through the adoption of Minimum Environmental Criteria (CAM) for an increasing number of production sectors. CAM are currently in place for 18 categories of supplies and procurements.” (p. 38) “The Italian Government supports public and private sector initiatives to promote attention, inclusion and protection of children’s and adolescents’ rights in business practices with the aim of integrating them into all aspects of the value chain” (p. 40) “At the European level, the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 establishing supply chain Due Diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, minerals and gold, originating in conflict or high-risk areas, has recently led EU Member States to take action to adapt their legal and regulatory systems to introduce this new obligation for Union importers. More recently, the debate on Due Diligence has been deepened with a view to its broader mandatory scope: the EU Commission, in its 2018 Action Plan on Sustainable Financial Growth, drew the attention of all stakeholders to the need to develop strategic tools that incorporate Due Diligence along the supply chain. Following the European Parliament Resolution of 29 May 2018, dedicated to sustainable finance for the progressive definition of a mandatory Due Diligence framework, in January 2020 the EU Commission published a specific study on regulatory production process and aimed at compiling a comprehensive measure on mandatory Due Diligence. Finally, in its Resolution of 10 March 2021, the European Parliament addressed to the Commission recommendations concerning Due Diligence and Corporate Responsibility for a future directive, which would contribute to preventing and mitigating potential or actual negative impacts of business action on human rights, the environment and good governance.” (p. 43) “To this end Italy renews its commitment to ensure that companies controlled or participated in by the State, companies that are supported or have access to governmental benefits, companies that contract or conclude trade transactions with the State, carry out their production activities in compliance with international and European standards, both binding and non-binding, and of related national legislative measures to implement these standards for a full and concrete protection of human rights along the whole supply chain.” (p. 48) “Italy has performed best practices through awareness campaigns and training activities in line with the OECD Guidelines on Due Diligence, as well as the relevant EU regulations. In addition, again with reference to responsible trade in minerals, Regulation (EU) 2017/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council was adopted in 2017. This established supply chain Due Diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten their ores, and gold, originating in conflict or high-risk zones. It has been transposed into Italian law through Legislative Decree No. 13 of 2 February 2021, which establishes Due Diligence obligations in the supply chain for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold, originating in conflict or high-risk areas.” (p. 52) “32. Participate in relevant OECD, European Union and other international initiatives on sustainable supply chains, human rights and Due Diligence.” (p. 66) “35. continuing the promotion and protection of human rights, with a proactive role of the Inter-ministerial Committee for Human Rights, in correlation with the priority lines introduced in the framework of the PNRR and the SNSVS, including – among others – issues such as anticorruption, non-financial information disclosure , supply chain, environmental issues, decent work and non-discrimination in favour of competing companies in public calls for tender and within contracts stipulated with companies for the purchase of goods and services, with particular regard to (i) Italian companies operating abroad; (ii) Italian companies using foreign suppliers; (iii) foreign companies” (p. 66) “36. promote the use of distributed ledger technologies, such as blockchain, to facilitate the traceability of products and services along global supply chains, including at sectoral level and in coordination with International Organizations.” (p. 67) “38. Further promote awareness of the OECD Guides on Due Diligence for Companies Operating in Weak Governance Zones (the “Risk Awareness Tool for Multinational Companies in Weak Governance Zones” and the “Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas”).” (p. 67) “50. Contribute, through exchange with governments and social partners, to good practices and common strategies to support the application of Due Diligence mechanisms in the debate on “Decent Work in the Global Supply Chain” promoted by ILO” (p, 68) “The Ministry of Justice has recently set up a working group with the CNPDS (National Centre for Prevention and Social Defence Foundation), Confindustria and Assonime (…) In particular, the working group intends to propose solutions to remedy the following critical aspects of the current legislation: – lack of legislative recognition about procedural collaboration from companies (e.g. probation as for US DPA and NPA), against the introduction of non-accountability of physical persons (e.g. in tax crimes and crimes against the public administration)” (p. 17) “Italy’s second National Action Plan on Business and Human Rights (NAPBHR) aims to be an evolving and increasingly effective functional tool in light of the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals, and the contextual challenges that arise at the global level. (…) the second Italian NAP-BHR intends to strengthen the application of the UNGPs through a series of complementary measures, referring in particular to the following guidelines: – the systematic promotion of BHR issues in all relevant international fora as an integral part of a universal vision of Human Rights, Sustainable Development, Democracy and the Rule of Law. In this context, the application of the UNGPs should therefore also be promoted in relation to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda (in particular SDGs 4, 5, 8, 10, 12, 16, 17) and the contents introduced by the UNGPs 10+ project initiated by the relevant UN Working Group on Business and Human Rights” (p. 7) “8. The consolidation of Italy’s role in the context of international cooperation processes for human rights-based development, with a view to achieving the sustainable development goals set out in the 2030 Agenda.” (p. 11) “Two key initiatives are planned to be concluded in 2021: the triennial review process of the SNSvS and the compilation of the National Action Plan on Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development (PCSD). Both these initiatives entail large participation of civil society, scientific institutions and local actors. In this context, collaboration agreements have been signed with Regions, the Autonomous Province of Trento and 14 metropolitan cities for the definition and implementation of Regional and Provincial Strategies and Metropolitan Agendas for Sustainable Development. These are conceived as tools for coordinating the implementation of the SDSvS and the 2030 Agenda at the local level. The monitoring of Italy’s performance of the SNSvS (People, Planet, Prosperity, Peace, Partnership and Vectors of Sustainability) will also continue. Also the National Forum for Sustainable Development is preserved, involving 190 organizations (civil society associations, but also businesses, universities, NGOs) that promote actions and policies for of sustainability. Active involvement of young people is also granted: indeed the National Youth Council, AIESEC Italy and Youth Network are part of the Forum. In 2021 the Project “Policy coherence for sustainable development: mainstreaming the SDGs in Italian decision making process” (PCSD Project) has been launched. It is funded by the EU Commission with the aim of facilitating the inclusion of different actors in the review process of the SNSvS and in the definition of a National Action Plan for policy coherence for sustainable development. Within environmental management systems for companies, the recognition of the Ecolabel and related adhesion to eco-management and audit (EMAS) is particularly important. The Italian national competent body for applying community schemes is the Committee for the Ecolabel and Ecoaudit, established in 1995 and currently composed of representatives of the Ministries for Ecological Transition, Economic Development, Health and Economy and Finance, with the technical support of ISPRA. Since 2018 the regulation for the promotion of products with high environmental qualification certified by the “Made Green in Italy” (MGI) logo is in force: it is aimed at promoting sustainable models of production and consumption, according to the EU PEF (Product Environmental Footprint) methodology for the determination of environmental footprint of products as defined in EU Commission Recommendation 2013/179/EU. The purpose of the MGI scheme is to direct the initiatives of the Italian production system towards use of environmental footprint as a lever for the improvement and enhancement of Made in Italy products with good environmental performance (guaranteed by a scientifically reliable system). It aims to facilitate the identification of products by consumers so as to encourage more conscious choices. It combines environmental sustainability performance of products, throughout their value chain, with Made in Italy, linked to excellent national production system. It is an institutional certification based on the European PEF methodology, implemented through additional sustainability requirements and more ambitious national environmental quality requirements. In addition, it is the only certification that integrates requirements that ask companies to communicate environmental footprint of products to consumers (ISO14025 type 3 labels), with requirements that allow access to the scheme only for excellent products, better than the average (ISO 14024 type 1 labels). Considerable opportunities are therefore provided for national producers who intend to make use of this new tool, which straddles the line between environmental policy and corporate marketing. In fact, many sectors have expressed interest in the scheme and are hoping for a new call for CPRs. Adherence to the scheme involves two steps: the first concerns the drafting of Product Category Rules-RCP (technical documents containing methodological indications for calculating environmental footprint of a given product category) and the second involves actual adherence to the scheme. Companies conclude the process by receiving a certification by a third party so that they could communicate final results and ensure maximum transparency of the entire process. The “Made Green in Italy” scheme attributes the logo to be attached to products with high environmental qualification and a detailed declaration available through a QR code that provides clear, uniform, complete and transparent information to consumers. With regard to forthcoming measures, calls for CPRs will be launched periodically as well as calls to support companies wishing to join the MGI scheme. The Manual for the Use of the MGI Logo according to the Made Green in Italy Regulation and 12 new CPRs have been published in June 2021 for the following sectors/products: Agri-Food Sector: Grana Padano, Provolone Tutela Valpadana, Vinegar, Dry pasta, Fresh pork meat, Fresh beef meat. Industrial sector: Laundry-Industrial laundry services, Carded wool-textile, Wooden packaging manufacture, Steel, Geotextiles and related products, Raw tobacco. Another relevant policy is the Environmental Footprint Assessment Programme, launched by the Ministry for Ecological Transition in 2010 to measure and improve environmental performance of private and public sectors. It provides for products (goods and services) and organizational certification, and in its experimental phase, among environmental indicators, it has favoured the analysis of the carbon footprint. Indeed it is an environmental driver, closely linked to climate change, and has an added value for the competitiveness of Italian businesses on international markets. Companies that join the programme, after signing a Voluntary Agreement with the Ministry for Ecological Transition, receive a certification by a third party in order to be able to communicate final results in accordance with the communication guidelines of the Programme and guarantee maximum transparency of the whole process. The programme remains operational until the full implementation of the scheme for all production sectors. Companies that join the programme, after signing a Voluntary Agreement with the Ministry for Ecological Transition, receive a certification by a third party in order to be able to communicate final results in accordance with the communication guidelines of the Programme and guarantee maximum transparency of the whole process. The programme remains operational until the full implementation of the scheme for all production sectors. The Guide aims to provide operational guidance on how to take social aspects into account in the definition of public tenders relating to supply, service and works contracts. It considers experiences of integrating social criteria in public procurement developed by different EU countries. The implementation of Green Public Procurement has also the purpose to develop circular supply chains, through the adoption of Minimum Environmental Criteria (CAM) for an increasing number of production sectors In addition, Legislative Decree No. 50 of 19 April 2016 in transposing EU Directives 23, 24 and 25/2014, outlines a regulatory framework for social and environmental responsibility in the management of public procurement, including the possibility of introducing criteria relating also to human rights within the contract life cycle (definition of the subject of the contract, criteria for selection of candidates, technical specifications, award criteria and contract performance clauses). The EU Commission has recently published a second edition of the guide for socially sustainable procurement (“Buying Social – A guide to taking account of social considerations in public procurement” – Second edition (2021/C 237/01)), referred to in the previous NAP BHR. It has provided indications to identify a set of clauses that will be included by ANAC in the Standard Notice for e-procurement. The inclusion of such clauses in the Standard Notice for contracts carried out through eprocurement platforms is a fundamental measure for their adoption by national contracting stations. The obligation to adopt electronic tools for tender procedures is in force since 2018. Moreover a strategic line to improve public procurement involves the professionalization of operators and the progressive centralization of purchases, thus facilitating the proper inclusion of social and ecological elements in procurement since the planning stage To this scope a full life-cycle monitoring through the National Database of Public Contracts, managed by ANAC, will be facilitated by the adoption of the new models covered by Regulation (EU) 1780 of 2019, which will be fully operational in October 2023. In collaboration with other administrations concerned for adoption of models and adaptation to national requirements, ANAC will give right emphasis identification processes over social and environmental sustainability clauses in calls for tenders and compliance with them throughout the life cycle of the contract: this approach has already been used at European level to introduce new standard f for data collection and publication on contracts in order to monitor the achievement of the objectives set out in Directive (EU) 2019/1161 of 20 June 2019, on the promotion of clean and energy-efficient road transport vehicles.” (p. 38) “Italy, with regard to the Initiative undertaken in December 2019 by the new EU Commission for a Green Deal that aims by 2050 to a climate-neutral Europe, has established a fund for public investment (€ 4.24 billion for years from 2020 to 2023). It is intended to support innovative investment projects and programmes with a high level of environmental sustainability, which will be used to support investments in relation to circular economy, as well as in de-carbonisation, urban regeneration, sustainable tourism, adaptation and mitigation of risks from climate change.” (p. 34) “2. Update the implementation assessment information of Legislative Decree No. 231/2001 in order to evaluate its extension in terms of objectives and application of the administrative liability of legal persons, and to pursue the following objectives in this area: – the fight against the crisis and the rate of unemployment suffered by economic sectors most affected by measures to counter the epidemic emergency (catering and the gastronomic sector; tourism/hotel sector; small businesses/individuals in the craft and retail sectors of Made in Italy)” (p. 61) “46. Strengthen support, at international and European level, for the promotion and inclusion of social and environmental sustainability clauses in international and trade and investment treaties” (p. 68) “According to these premises, as well as in the framework of Italy’s constant commitment as a member of the Human Rights Council, the second Italian NAP-BHR intends to strengthen the application of the UNGPs through a series of complementary measures, referring in particular to the following guidelines: – addressing issues and practices related to the protection of the environment, health, decent work and ‘Human Rights Defenders’, also in the face of the new challenges posed by the gig economy and in the context of the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), in correlation with the challenges of multidimensional post-Covid-19 reconstruction” (p. 7) “A particular attention to BHR issues has been introduced in the Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy 2020-2024, in the perspective of a wider process for the elaboration of a comprehensive EU framework dedicated to the implementation of the UNGPs. In the aforementioned document, the institutions commit themselves to conducting a dialogue with businesses in order to increase the level of protection and promotion of human rights, with the aim of combating corruption and introducing good practices in the area of corporate social responsibility, Due Diligence, accountability and access to remedy, and to fostering contacts and exchanges between businesses and civil society also in the area of women’s empowerment, sustainable development and decent work.” (p. 9) “For a commitment to ‘Build Back Better’, it is necessary to strengthen measures to safeguard the rights and social protection of workers, especially female workers, together with greater use of financial assistance and tax relief measures.” (p. 10) “”The NAP addresses the issue of the negative impact of business activities on human rights and identifies specific commitments with the aim of effectively integrating the UNGPs into the national system and business activities” and introduces limited objectives and actions, with reference to the national context translated into the following priorities: 2. The fight against caporalato (especially in the agricultural and construction sectors) and forms of exploitation, forced labour, child labour, slavery and irregular work, with particular attention to migrants and victims of trafficking.” (p. 10) “7. The protraction of planning and implementation of supervisory actions and information initiatives for the prevention of offences and the promotion of legality in the field of outsourcing of entrepreneurial activities and subcontracting chains, aimed at guaranteeing adequate protection for workers and effective awareness of their rights.” (p. 11) “Law No. 199/2016 on combating caporalato in agriculture has already achieved significant results: the Italian Government aims to fully implement the law, not only to repress the phenomenon but also to prevent it, as well as to strengthen the Network of quality agricultural work. To this end, on 16 October 2019, the Inter-institutional Steering Committee on Caporalato was set up, whose work led to the approval of the Three-Year Plan (2020 – 2022) in February 2020. This plan develops the national strategy to combat caporalato and labour exploitation in agriculture and obtained the agreement of the Unified Conference in May 2020. (…) It provides for an implementation strategy articulated in three different phases: an initial phase of analysis of the phenomenon, followed by emergency interventions in the most critical areas and then a systemic action that embraces the entire national territory. The latter is structured on four priority axes that concern: (i) prevention, (ii) vigilance and contrast to the phenomenon, (iii) protection and assistance for victims, (iv) their socio-occupational re-integration. For each of these axes, the Plan identifies priority actions (in a total of 10 actions of which 7 are dedicated to prevention) that involve, in a multi-level governance setting, the different administrations at central, regional and local level. The thematic priorities of the Plan were entrusted to six dedicated Groups, which were joined over time by two additional technical groups committed, respectively, to the development of the information system on the agricultural labour market and to the protection, assistance and socio-occupational reintegration of victims, both coordinated by the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies. In 2020 a new working group was created within the Committee coordinated by the Directorate General of Immigration and Integration Policies of the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies. It was dedicated to protection and first aid to victims of labour exploitation. The working group counts upon the collaboration of experts from the Department for Equal Opportunities of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers, ANCI Reception and Integration System (former SPRAR), the Directorate General for the fight against poverty 20 and social planning of the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies, Regions, ANPAL, INAPP, INL, IOM and Consorzio Nova. The work of the group, which started in December 2020, continued in the first half of 2021 and, in particular, 7 meetings were held which led, in line with the objectives of the Three-Year Plan, to the development of a draft of guidelines on the identification, protection and assistance of victims of labour exploitation and a proposal to amend the concerned legislation (Arts. 18 and 22 of Legislative Decree No. 286/1998). The Guidelines were officially presented to Committee in its meeting of 27 July 2021, obtaining broad consensus. The working group also started an in-depth analysis over forms of support and compensation provided in the current legislation and of additional measures that could be issued to promote better protection of victims of labour exploitation. (…) The National Institute of Labour (INL) has launched extraordinary surveillance campaigns based on a multi-agency approach in some areas of Southern Italy (only in the agricultural sector) and of Central and Northern Italy (mainly, but not only, in agriculture) where the phenomena of forced labour and labour exploitation of migrants are particularly present. In order to implement these projects, special task forces were set up consisting of local inspectors, Carabinieri from the Labour Inspectorate Units, inspectors from other territories, as well as the aforementioned cultural mediators. The inspections were 22 planned in coordination with local authorities (Public Prosecutor’s Office and Prefectures) and with other supervisory bodies involved from time to time (INPS, INAIL, State Police, GdF, ASL…). The presence of the IOM cultural mediators, moreover, favoured the establishment of a relationship of trust between the inspection bodies and exploited workers, promoting their cooperation and also ensuring the activity of taking charge and protection of potential victims for the purpose of their subsequent socio-occupational reintegration (also through the paths provided by Arts. 18 and 22 of Legislative Decree No. 286/1998 – Consolidated Immigration Act). (…) In 2020 the INL has significantly implemented its counteracting action on caporalato and labour exploitation. It has also implemented action 8 “Strengthening of surveillance activities and counteracting labour exploitation” of the Three-year Plan to combat labour exploitation in agriculture and caporalato (2020-2022) and of aforementioned project initiatives based on experimentational approach. In particular, the INL has carried out and coordinated extraordinary surveillance campaigns in some areas of Southern Italy (in the agricultural sector only, with the project Su.Pr.Eme (funded by the EU Commission and supported by the project PIU’ SU.PRE.ME, for an amount of about € 50 million for the implementation of interventions in Puglia, Campania, Basilicata, Calabria and Sicily) and Central Italy (mainly, but not only in agriculture, with the project A.L.T. Caporalato! project, financed by the Ministry of Labour and Social Policies for an amount of € 3 million for actions in the territories of central and northern Italy), where the phenomena of forced labour and labour exploitation of migrants are particularly diffused. In order to ensure the best possible organization of task forces in the geographical areas concerned, particular emphasis was placed on the activation of all useful coordination with the local Public Prosecutor’s Office and all appropriate institutional cooperation at territorial level with the Prefecture, the police and other supervisory bodies (INPS, INAIL and ASL). In order to ensure compliance with health and safety regulations and thus contribute to reducing the risk of accidents and preventing occupational deaths, all useful synergies have been activated within the Regional Committees pursuant to Art. 7 of the Consolidated Act No. 81/2008 and the Provincial Committees for the participation of ASL prevention technicians in the activities of the task forces. Finally, contacts were made with the IOM referents of each regional context and with the bodies and associations of the anti-trafficking network in territories involved to ensure timeliness and effectiveness of any interventions to take charge of and provide protection to victims of severe exploitation identified during the operations. According to collected data and constantly evolving, during 2020 in 44 weeks task forces took action in Basilicata, Campania, Calabria and Apulia Regions and in L’Aquila, Latina and Florence provinces: 758 inspections were carried out and 4,767 work positions were checked. As a result of the inspections (some of which are still in progress), to date, 1,069 workers have been identified as being involved in labour violations, 421 of whom were employed illegally, 205 potential victims of labour exploitation were identified and 22 perpetrators were reported to judicial authorities. INL inspection staff activities in the fight against caporalato and labour exploitation, despite difficulties due to the epidemiological emergency, have achieved the following results: – 478 offenders were referred to the judicial authorities, 61 of whom were arrested; – protection of 1,850 possible victims of the crime of caporalato and labour exploitation, 119 of whom are more exposed due to their non-EU citizenship status without a regular residence permit. In relation to the agricultural sector only: – 323 offenders were referred to judicial authorities, 43 of whom were arrested; – identification of 1,104 victims of exploitation, including 55 without a regular residence permit. The percentage of workers who are victims of labour exploitation in relation to the total number of irregular workers in the primary sector was by far the highest at 18.6%. On the other hand, taking as a reference the parameter of the number of irregular inspections defined in the year by the INL staff , in agriculture, an average of 37 exploited workers were found for every 100 inspected companies against which irregularities were contested. In 2021, in light of the significant results achieved the previous year also thanks to the extraordinary task forces of the two projects mentioned above, INL has further strengthened such inspection action on the territory through the scheduling of about 150 weeks of task force, with a commitment more than tripled compared to the 44 weeks of activities carried out in 2020. In addition, given the success of these experiences, on 11 March 2021 the INL and IOM signed a memorandum of understanding. Lasting two years, the memorandum is aimed at structuring the collaboration between the INL and IOM and extending multi-agency interventions to the whole national territory. It also takes into account the indications and objectives of the Three-Year Plan. On the basis of the lessons learnt, specific guidelines for the personnel employed in the surveillance operations on the territory are being developed within the Working Group coordinated by INL. (p.23) “Regarding gender leadership issues, the Task Force “Women for a New Renaissance”, established by the Ministry of Equal Opportunities and Family in 2020 to address the impact of Covid-19 on gender issues has produced a Final Report, based on quantitative data and qualitative scientific information on the impact of the pandemic in different sectors. Among the Task Force’s multiple proposals there are those ones targeted to: – increase the proportion of women in all areas of employment; – overcoming barriers to advancement in career paths, particularly in the fastest growing fields (STEM, computer science, cloud computing, data and artificial intelligence); – countering gender stereotypes that prevent women from achieving leadership responsibilities, in order to activate new energies and opportunities for all. (…) The National Recovery and Resilience Plan (PNRR) also addresses gender inequalities in a cross-cutting manner. In particular, the PNRR places three cross-cutting priorities alongside the three strategic axes shared at European level (digitalization and innovation, ecological transition and social inclusion). This includes the promotion of gender equality, with the aim of investing at least € 7 billion by 2026, to be used to ensure a level playing field in the labour market, close the gender pay gap and increase the number of women in positions of responsibility, ultimately including the presence of women in the political sphere. (…) Law No. 4 of 15 January 2021, ratifying and implementing the International Labour Organization Convention n. 190 on the elimination of violence and harassment in the workplace, represents an important evolution in the field of gender protection in the business context. Legislative Decree No. 81/08 and related Decree No. 106/09 had adequately covered safety issues in the workplace, but had not included the issue of harassment, which in fact is limited to occupational safety measures or to internal policies and voluntary practices of companies. In addition, to clarifying the scope of their application, measure 4/2021 provides for the adoption of an inclusive, integrated and gender-centred approach: the private sector, like the public sector, is therefore adopting concrete procedures and tools with the goal of combating violence and protecting employees through guidance and training on prevention. With regard to gender discrimination in the workplace, territorial offices of the National Labour Inspectorate (INL), performing their supervisory activity, also carry out investigations in relation to equal opportunity regulations and the prohibition of gender discrimination in the workplace, including in terms of remuneration.” (p. 29) “Italy also promotes “family friendly policies”, as national and corporate policies aimed at supporting workers in their role as parents/caregivers. On this issue, UNICEF has formulated some important indications on the best ways Governments and the private sector can build “family friendly” policies: – encouraging employers to introduce gender-sensitive and inclusive paid leave entitlements, flexible working arrangements and childcare support systems; – the introduction of paid parental, maternity and paternity paid leave in the early-birth period and for the first year of a child’s life; fair and gender-sensitive parental leave to ensure that no parent is overburdened by family care; leave available to all, both for full-time employees and those working part-time or under non-standard contractual arrangements; and financial coverage linked to birth care; – childcare services made accessible by the end of parental leave, so that there is no gap in available support; – quality childcare services, made accessible, flexible and affordable, available to all children, regardless of family circumstances; – alignment of childcare services with other family support policies, such as universal family allowances, to reduce the risk of existing inequalities in access to public childcare facilities.” (p. 40) “In general, the issue of inclusion of vulnerable people in the workplace and the promotion of diversity management is a strategic line of action under the mandate of the National Anti-Racial Discrimination Office (UNAR). With reference to the adoption of National Plans and Strategies, in coherence with the European indications, UNAR started consultation processes involving administrations at central, regional and local level and third sector representatives for the elaboration of the following documents: – the National LGBTI Strategy; – the National Plan against Racism, Xenophobia and Intolerance; – the National Strategy for the Inclusion of Roma, Sinti and Caminanti. These Plans and Strategies will foresee, with reference to their respective priority axis “Work”, concretely achievable objectives and actions specifically aimed at the protection of human rights through the promotion of diversity management in the workplace and the sharing and dissemination of good corporate practices. (…) On this matter during 2020 the INL inspection staff implemented, as usual, initiatives for the prevention and promotion of legality, through the organization of specific information meetings, pursuant to Art. 8, paragraph 1, Legislative Decree No. 124/2004. It also deals with equal opportunities and combating discrimination in the workplace. Such regulation is among the competences of Labour Inspectorates at the local level. Through their own inspection staff, they can organize specific events with the purpose of guaranteeing and assuring proper compliance with labour regulations and social security and assistance measures, focusing on the social relevance as well as on legislative and interpretative innovations from Administrations. (…) With reference to the need to draw attention to impacts of business activity on family life and children’s rights, the Department for Family Policies published the new public call “#Conciliamo”, amounting to € 74 million, on 8 November 2019 for family-work reconciliation projects by companies, networks and groups of associated or controlled companies. Available funds will be used for interventions that promote a welfare tailored to families and to improve the quality of life of working mothers and fathers. The call has several specific objectives: the demographic revival, increase in female employment, rebalancing of workloads between men and women, support for families with relatives with disabilities, health protection, combating the abandonment of the elderly. Participation has been opened to companies referred to in Arts. 2082 and 2083 of the Civil Code, as well as networks and groups of related or controlled companies.” (p. 41) “Legislative Decree No. 50/2016 (Public Contracts Code) has transposed 2014 EU Directives in force in this field: basic principles are aimed at guaranteeing access to and the conduct of decent work, respect for social and labour rights, as far as SMEs’ participation in public contracts.” (p. 48) “In Italy Whistleblowing was introduced by the anti-corruption law (Law No. 190 of 6 November 2012, “Provisions for the prevention and repression of corruption and illegality in public administration”), adopted in compliance with recommendations and conventional obligations emanating from the UN, OECD, Council of Europe and European Union. This law provides for a system of enhanced protection for public employees who report unlawful conducts. Law No. 179 of 30 November 2017 strengthened the preexisting whistleblower protection for public employees and partially extended the same protection to the private sector.” (p. 50) “In compliance with Law No. 125/2014, which therefore considers companies as subjects of cooperation, the adherence of the company to the Global Compact has been made a mandatory prerequisite for participation to Profit Call published by the Italian Agency for Development Cooperation and dedicated to Italian and European companies for the implementation of innovative and sustainable business initiatives to be carried out in Developing Countries. In order to participate in the above-mentioned Call, companies must have formally adhered to the 10 UN principles of the Global Compact and the UNGPs. Formal adherence to the principles of the UN Global Compact such as those relating to respect for human rights, workers, environmental protection and the fight against corruption, is a necessary requirement not only for sustainable economic growth, but also for the affirmation of democratic and participatory principles and the elimination of discrimination and inequality. Attention to human resources and compliance with local regulations on worker safety are relevant and qualifying elements in the evaluation of Profit Initiatives in order to ensure respect for workers’ rights, environmental and health standards and human rights. In the Call for Proposals, it is explicitly provided that the implementation of the interventions must take place in compliance with the principles and aims of Law No. 125/2014, international standards on human rights, decent work, social responsibility and environmental protection, as well as the rules on public contracts and, in particular, the Public Contracts Code.” (p. 54) “2. Update the implementation assessment information of Legislative Decree No. 231/2001 in order to evaluate its extension in terms of objectives and application of the administrative liability of legal persons, and to pursue the following objectives in this area: – the fight against the crisis and the rate of unemployment suffered by economic sectors most affected by measures to counter the epidemic emergency (catering and the gastronomic sector; tourism/hotel sector; small businesses/individuals in the craft and retail sectors of Made in Italy); – the implementation of inclusion policies that enhance the value of the human being coming from the most socially fragile contexts, with particular reference to the contribution offered by female population, through its full involvement in management and in social recovery of the assets in question” (p. 61) “3. Strengthen the role of competent bodies and inspection activities in combating and controlling the emergence of irregular work and caporalato, pursuant to Art. 103 of the “Relaunch” Decree-Law No. 34 of 19 May 2020 (“Emergence of labour relations”)” (p. 61) “4. Ensure the full implementation of the Three-Year Plan to Combat Labor Exploitation in Agriculture and Caporalato 2020-2022.” (p. 61) “5. Develop new coordination measures in the activities of prevention and control of the phenomenon of irregular work and to encourage the operation of the “Network of quality agricultural work”.” (p. 61) “6. Ensure full implementation of the National Action Plan against Trafficking and Serious Exploitation of Human Beings.” (p. 62) “8. Continue to implement the provisions contained in the Second Disability Action Programme, with particular reference to line 5 “Labour and Employment” and to provisions concerning the definition of support measures and a system of incentives for first and second level bargaining over flexibility, part-time work and work-life balance for persons with disabilities or serious and chronic progressive illnesses or caregivers of persons with serious disabilities.” (p. 62) “9. Promote the employment inclusion of persons with disabilities with attention to persons with disabilities with more severe disabling conditions.” (p. 62) “11. Promote in a strengthened way women’s leadership and women’s empowerment in the business sector, through an effective implementation of Law No. 120/2011, and to strengthen measures to prevent gender discrimination in the workplace – depending on the better implementation of Law No. 4 of 15 January 2021 of ratification of the International Labour Organization Convention No. 190 on the Elimination of Violence and Harassment in the Workplace. To this complex end, further actions will be promoted to: (i) certify equality for companies through the definition of a simple, fast, streamlined and objective tool that measures the situation of staff according to different factors (recruitment, remuneration, career development), capable of stimulating change and having an impact on the entire productive and social system; (ii) assess the gender impact (ex-ante and ex-post) in all business processes, in particular with regard to corporate restructuring processes (relevant for safeguarding gender balance in the post-Covid phase); (iii) to promote transparency measures provided for in current legislation on compliance with gender equality rules by companies and public bodies.” (p. 62) “13. Consolidate the commitment made at the national level with respect to international standards, in particular the Protocol relating to ILO Convention on Forced Labour of 2014 and Recommendation CM/Rec(2016)3 (monitoring) adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe with reference to business and human rights.” (p. 63) “14. Update the information on the current legislative framework to combat illegal work and labour exploitation in the agricultural, construction, manufacturing and service sectors.” (p. 64) “21. Reaffirm as a priority the elimination of all forms of exploitation of child labour in Italy and with reference to the economic activities of Italian companies abroad, as provided for by the relevant ILO Conventions; to this end, encourage the dissemination among companies of initiatives aimed at increasing attention on impacts of business activities on children’s rights and on the need for the inclusion of adequate remedies and mitigation measures as per the risk of violation of such rights. The inclusion of children’s rights in business practices includes: the provision of “family friendly policies” designed to support workers in their role as parents/caregivers (smart working, paid parental leave, social protection and adequate wages for all); the introduction of measures to monitor the presence of minors in the workplace; the adoption of Child Safeguarding Policies/Codes of Conduct to foresee, report and take charge of potential risk situations for minors who come into contact with the company; the provision of security guarantees for digital environment (data protection, access to age-appropriate content, privacy protection).” (p. 64) “22. Encourage businesses in the dissemination of a culture of non-discrimination by: (i) the promotion of agreements/protocols of understanding with trade unions and employers’ organizations for common and synergic actions to prevent and combat forms of discrimination in the workplace and for the full inclusion of workers; (ii) the collection of statistical data on discrimination in employment and diversity management practices in Italian companies; (iii) the promotion of good inclusive practices in the workplace; (iv) the promotion of socio-occupational inclusion of transgender people, also through information, training, accompaniment and support to self-entrepreneurship; (v) the promotion of an action to involve Italian companies, in line with UN Standards Standards of Conduct for Business on Tackling Discrimination against LGBTI people, in order to prevent and countering discriminatory behaviors and conducts against LGBTIQ+ persons and ensuring the full enjoyment of their rights; (vi) the promotion of socio-occupational inclusion of Roma, Sinti and Caminanti people in precarious socio-economic conditions also through actions aimed at starting employment diagnoses, planning of personalized support towards training and employment, promotion of active social policies to encourage participation in the labour market as well as opportunities and strategies for the development of entrepreneurial initiatives (such as, for example, accompaniment and support for business start-up and/or repositioning of economic companies operating in critical sectors) (vii) the promotion of entrepreneurial policies and good practices on inclusion and diversity management, entailing the implementation and reporting of the Charter for Equal Opportunities and Equality at Work.” (p. 65) “23. Monitor the application of artificial intelligence in the workplace (e.g. recruitment mechanisms) for the purpose of assessing impact on human rights in terms of inclusion and non-discrimination.” (p. 65) “50. Contribute, through exchange with governments and social partners, to good practices and common strategies to support the application of Due Diligence mechanisms in the debate on “Decent Work in the Global Supply Chain” promoted by ILO.” (p. 68)Children’s rights
I. Guidelines and General Principles
II. Premises
b) Italy and the UNGPs
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Smuggling of migrants and trafficking in human beings
International development cooperation
Children’s and adolescents’ rights
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Conflict-affected areas
I. Guidelines and General Principles
III. Expectations towards Business Companies
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Responsible Conduct and Due Diligence in the framework of the United Nations, OECD and European Union
Internationalization of companies
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
ANNEX 2 – Summary of the Results of the Assessment concerning the Implementation of the first PAN BHR
Construction sector
II. Premises
b) Italy and the UNGPs
c) National Priorities
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Corporate law & corporate governance
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Legality Rating
Responsible Conduct and Due Diligence in the framework of the United Nations, OECD and European Union
Corruption
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Administrative liability of companies
Public Procurement
Fight against corruption
Internationalization of companies
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Data protection & privacy
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Children’s and adolescents’ rights
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Development finance institutions
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
International development cooperation
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Digital technology & electronics sector
I. Guidelines and general principles
II. Premises
c) National Priorities
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Gender dimension
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Energy sector
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Climate change: “carbon neutrality” / “energy neutrality”
Environment & climate change
I. Guidelines and General Principles
II. Premises
a) Introduction
b) Italy and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)
c) National Priorities
III. Expectations towards business companies
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
a) Foundational Principles
Irregular work and the agricultural sector
Environment
“Circular Economy; National Waste Management Programme; National Waste Production Prevention Programme
Sustainable Development (National Strategy on Sustainable Development – SNSvS; environmental management systems and certifications; “Made Green in Italy”; Minimum Environmental Criteria – CAM; climate change – PNRR)
Climate change: “carbon neutrality” / “energy neutrality”
Biodiversity
Public Procurement
Internationalization of Companies
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Equality & non-discrimination
II. Premises
b) Italy and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)
c) National Priorities
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Gender dimension
The principle of Diversity management in the business context
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Export credit
Extractives sector
III. Expectations towards Business Companies
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Responsible Conduct and Due Diligence in the framework of the United Nations, OECD and European Union
Internationalization of companies
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
ANNEX 2 – Summary of the Results of the Assessment concerning the Implementation of the first PAN BHR
Extraterritorial jurisdiction
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Internationalization of companies
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Finance & banking sector
II. Premises
a) Introduction
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
a) Foundational Principles
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Fisheries and aquaculture sectors
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Forced labour & modern slavery
II. Premises
b) Italy and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Irregular work and the agricultural sector
Smuggling of migrants and trafficking in human beings
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Freedom of association
Garment, Textile and Footwear Sector
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Responsible Conduct and Due Diligence in the framework of the United Nations, OECD and European Union
Gender & women’s rights
I. Guidelines and general principles
II. Premises
c) National Priorities
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
International development cooperation
Gender dimension
Children’s and adolescent’s rights
The principle of Diversity management in the business context
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Guidance to business
III. Expectations towards business companies
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Irregular work in the agricultural sector
Vulnerable groups: persons with disabilities
Health and social care
I. Guidelines and general principles
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Irregular work in the agricultural sector
The principle of Diversity management in the business context
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Human rights defenders & whistle-blowers
I. Guidelines and general principles
II. Premises
b) Italy and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
b) Foundational Principles
Fight against corruption
Internationalization of companies
V. Updating, Monitoring and Dissemination of the Plan
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Human rights impact assessments
Indigenous peoples
Investment treaties & investor-state dispute settlements
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Judicial remedy
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Administrative liability of companies
Gender dimension
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Land
Mandatory human rights due diligence
I. Guidelines and general principles
II. Premises
b) Italy and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)
c) National Priorities
III. Expectations towards business companies
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Gender dimension
Responsible Conduct and Due Diligence in the framework of the United Nations, OECD and European Union
Training activities on human rights
Internationalization of companies
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Migrant workers
I. Guidelines and General Principles
II. Premises
b) Italy and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Irregular work and the agricultural sector
Smuggling of migrants and trafficking in human beings
The nexus State-Business
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
National Human Rights Institutions/ Ombudspersons
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
a) Foundational Principles
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
ANNEX 2 – Summary of the results of the assessment concerning the implementation of the first PAN-BHR
Non-financial reporting
III. Expectations towards business companies
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Gender dimension
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
ANNEX 2 – Summary of the results of the assessment concerning the implementation of the first PAN-BHR
Non-judicial grievance mechanisms
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Internationalization of companies
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
OECD National Contact Points
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
a) Foundational principles
Responsible Conduct and Due Diligence in the framework of the United Nations, OECD and European Union
Internationalization of Companies
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Persons with disabilities
I. Guidelines and General Principles
II. Premises
c) National Priorities
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Vulnerable groups: persons with disabilities
The principle of Diversity management in the business context
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Policy coherence
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Smuggling of migrants and trafficking in human beings
International Development Cooperation
Sustainable development (…)
The principle of Diversity management in the business context
V. Updating, monitoring and dissemination of the plan
Privatisation
Public procurement
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Environment
Public procurement
Security sector
Small & medium-sized enterprises
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Administrative liability of companies
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
State Owned Enterprises/ Public Private Partnerships
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
The nexus State-Business
Supply chains
II. Premises
a) Introduction
c) National Priorities
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
a) Foundational principles
Irregular work and the agricultural sector
Gender dimension
Environment
Children’s and adolescents’ rights
Responsible Conduct and Due Diligence in the framework of the United Nations, OECD and European Union
The nexus State – Business
Internationalization of companies
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Taxation
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Administrative liability of companies
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
I. Guidelines and General Principles
II. Premises
c) National priorities
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Sustainable development
Tourism sector
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Sustainable development
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Trade
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP
Workers’ rights
I. Guidelines and General Principles
II. Premises
a) Introduction
b) Italy and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs)
c) National Priorities
IV. Italian ongoing activities and future commitments
Irregular work and the agricultural sector
Gender dimension
Children’s and adolescents’ rights
The principle of Diversity management in the business context
Public Procurement
Fight against corruption
Internationalization of companies
ANNEX 1 – Accountability Grid and Assessment Tools for the Implementation of the NAP