Search Results:

Guiding Principle 11

Business enterprises should respect human rights. This means that they should avoid infringing on the human rights of others and should address adverse human rights impacts with which they are involved. Commentary The responsibility to respect human rights is a global standard of expected conduct for all business enterprises wherever they operate. It exists independently of States’ abilities and/or…

Read more about Guiding Principle 11

Guiding Principle 10

States, when acting as members of multilateral institutions that deal with business-related issues, should: (a) Seek to ensure that those institutions neither restrain the ability of their member States to meet their duty to protect nor hinder business enterprises from respecting human rights; (b) Encourage those institutions, within their respective mandates and capacities, to promote business respect for human…

Read more about Guiding Principle 10

Guiding Principle 9

States should maintain adequate domestic policy space to meet their human rights obligations when pursuing business-related policy objectives with other States or business enterprises, for instance through investment treaties or contracts. Commentary Economic agreements concluded by States, either with other States or with business enterprises – such as bilateral investment treaties, freetrade agreements or contracts for investment projects – create…

Read more about Guiding Principle 9

Guiding Principle 8

States should ensure that governmental departments, agencies and other State-based institutions that shape business practices are aware of and observe the State’s human rights obligations when fulfilling their respective mandates, including by providing them with relevant information, training and support. Commentary There is no inevitable tension between States’ human rights obligations and the laws and policies they put in place…

Read more about Guiding Principle 8

Guiding Principle 7

Because the risk of gross human rights abuses is heightened in conflictaffected areas, States should help ensure that business enterprises operating in those contexts are not involved with such abuses, including by: (a) Engaging at the earliest stage possible with business enterprises to help them identify, prevent and mitigate the human rights-related risks of their activities and business relationships; (b)…

Read more about Guiding Principle 7

Guiding Principle 6

States should promote respect for human rights by business enterprises with which they conduct commercial transactions. Commentary States conduct a variety of commercial transactions with business enterprises, not least through their procurement activities. This provides States – individually and collectively – with unique opportunities to promote awareness of and respect for human rights by those enterprises, including through the…

Read more about Guiding Principle 6

Guiding Principle 5

States should exercise adequate oversight in order to meet their international human rights obligations when they contract with, or legislate for, business enterprises to provide services that may impact upon the enjoyment of human rights. Commentary States do not relinquish their international human rights law obligations when they privatize the delivery of services that may impact upon the enjoyment of…

Read more about Guiding Principle 5

Guiding Principle 4

States should take additional steps to protect against human rights abuses by business enterprises that are owned or controlled by the State, or that receive substantial support and services from State agencies such as export credit agencies and official investment insurance or guarantee agencies, including, where appropriate, by requiring human rights due diligence. Commentary States individually are the primary duty-bearers…

Read more about Guiding Principle 4

Guiding Principle 3

In meeting their duty to protect, States should: (a) Enforce laws that are aimed at, or have the effect of, requiring business enterprises to respect human rights, and periodically to assess the adequacy of such laws and address any gaps; (b) Ensure that other laws and policies governing the creation and ongoing operation of business enterprises, such as…

Read more about Guiding Principle 3

Guiding Principle 2

States should set out clearly the expectation that all business enterprises domiciled in their territory and/or jurisdiction respect human rights throughout their operations. Commentary At present States are not generally required under international human rights law to regulate the extraterritorial activities of businesses domiciled in their  territory and/or jurisdiction. Nor are they generally prohibited from…

Read more about Guiding Principle 2

Guiding Principle 1

States must protect against human rights abuse within their territory and/or jurisdiction by third parties, including business enterprises. This requires taking appropriate steps to prevent, investigate, punish and redress such abuse through effective policies, legislation, regulations and adjudication. Commentary States’ international human rights law obligations require that they respect, protect and fulfil the human rights of individuals within their…

Read more about Guiding Principle 1

Human rights defenders & Civic space

Human Rights defender (HRD) is a term used to describe “people who, individually or with others, act to promote or protect human rights in a peaceful manner”, as defined by the UN Special Rapporteur on human rights defenders. A human rights defender can be, for example, an individual such as a journalist, worker, lawyer, activist,…

Read more about Human rights defenders & Civic space

Children’s rights

In line with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) as well as the International Labour Organization (ILO) Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182),  and the ILO Minimum Age Convention (No. 138), “a child is a person below the age of eighteen years unless under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained…

Read more about Children’s rights

Argentina

Read more about Argentina

Denmark

Read more about Denmark

Finland

Read more about Finland

About

This website is an online “one-stop-shop” for information regarding National Action Plans (NAPs) on Business and Human Rights. It is managed by the Danish Institute for Human Rights (DIHR). What are National Action Plans? National action plans are policy documents in which a government articulates priorities and actions that it will adopt to support the…

Read more about About

Stakeholders

Multiple actors may find particular value in this website: Government officials and elected representatives may use this website to, for example, orient domestic policy-making, including at the local and sub-national levels; inform positions taken in international institutions or standard-setting processes; and support alignment between NAPs and other national plans and inform capacity-building efforts at all…

Read more about Stakeholders

Resources

National Action Plans (NAPs) are an essential opportunity for holding governments accountable for the protection of human rights against abuses by corporate actors. The following resources offer a set of tools for governments, civil society, business, and other actors to engage with in advocating for or developing NAPs, as well as links to NAPs that…

Read more about Resources

Home

*The DIHR takes no position on issues of sovereignty or territorial disputes. Borders on this map are based on UN Geospatial data Active i) Implementing a NAP; or ii) Implementing a NAP while developing a new NAP. Developing i) Developing a NAP without implementing a NAP. Other i) No longer implementing a NAP and not developing…

Read more about Home