Search Results:
Denmark
Introduction [page 9] The initiatives in the Danish Government’s action plan on Business and Human Rights are focused on preventing and mitigating adverse impacts on human rights by Danish companies at home and abroad.
Norway
3.2 Responsible Business Conduct [page 31] An enterprise may cause or contribute to adverse human rights impacts if for example its employees are working under disgraceful conditions or if the living conditions of the local community that are directly affected by the company’s operations decline without prior explanation from or dialogue with the relevant parties, including…
United Kingdom
The UK 2013 NAP The UK 2013 NAP does not contain a reference to GP13. The UK 2016 updated NAP The UK 2016 updated NAP does not contain a reference to GP13.
Sweden
2. The corporate responsibility to respect [page 13] The Government’s clear expectation is that companies operating in Sweden or abroad respect human rights in all their activities. This means that their business activity should not cause, contribute or be linked to human rights abuses, not least in conflict-affected areas, and that they should act to…
Belgium
PLANNED ACTIONS: Action point 1, Elaborer une boîte à outils destinée aux entreprises et organisations concernant les droits de l’Homme [Develop a toolkit for companies and organizations on human rights], presents the action of developing, in collaboration with experts and its main human rights stakeholders and organizations, a toolbox that will help companies prevent human…
Switzerland
4. Position of the Federal Council on the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights 4.3 The position and expectations of the Federal Council [page 7] The corporate responsibility to respect human rights refers to internationally recognised human rights. These include the human rights and principles rooted in the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human…