Search Results:

The Chilean NAP does not make an explicit reference to GP22.

Pillar II. The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights Strand 3: Report in the field of human rights [pages 56-57] The Guiding Principles stress the importance of the State in terms of encouraging business enterprises to communicate the way they address the risks of adverse impacts on human rights -through reports or other means. Sustainability…

The Chilean NAP does not make an explicit reference to GP20.

The Chilean NAP does not make an explicit reference to GP19.

The Chilean NAP does not make an explicit reference to GP18.

Pillar II. The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights Strand 2: Promotion of corporate due diligence in the field of human rights [pages 54-56] The need for the State to generate an understanding among business enterprises about due diligence in human rights was often mentioned in the citizens’ dialogues, as well as the creation of…

The Chilean NAP does not make an explicit reference to GP16.

The Chilean NAP does not make an explicit reference to GP15.

The Chilean NAP does not make an explicit reference to GP14.

The Chilean NAP does not make an explicit reference to GP13.

The Chilean NAP does not make an explicit reference to GP12.

The Chilean NAP does not make an explicit reference to GP11.

Pillar I. The State Duty to Protect Human Rights Strand 7: Strengthening of International Political Coherence [pages 47-48] While this process generated recommendations about coherence between policies at a national level, there were also recommendations identified about the importance of strengthening the coherence that must in Chile’s position about business and human rights, both at…

Pillar I. The State Duty to Protect Human Rights Strand 7: Strengthening of International Political Coherence [pages 47-48] While this process generated recommendations about coherence between policies at a national level, there were also recommendations identified about the importance of strengthening the coherence that must in Chile’s position about business and human rights, both at…

Pillar I. The State Duty to Protect Human Rights Strand 6: Strengthening Coherence between Public Policies [pages 44-47] There was constant mentioning at the participatory dialogues of the need to generate spaces for coordination within the State allowing to send a clear message about business and human rights by the different organisations and services, as…

The Chilean NAP does not have an explicit mention to GP7.

Pillar I. The State Duty to Protect Human Rights Strand 5: Public Contracts [pages 42-44] During activities with citizens’ participation, it was repeatedly said, as highlighted by the Guiding Principles, that the State must lead by example and include human rights standards in the purchase or goods and services. Thus, the State not only integrates…

The Chilean NAP does not have an explicit reference to GP5.

Pillar I. The State Duty to Protect Human Rights Strand 9: State Business Enterprises [pages 49-50] One of the focus areas of the Guiding Principles are public business enterprises and their special duty of care and diligence regarding the respect for human rights -because public business enterprises have the duty to lead by example. 9.1…

Pillar I. The State Duty to Protect Human Rights Strand 1: Training in the Field of Business and Human Rights [pages 29-33] The need to provide training in business and human rights was stated repeatedly during the different stages of the process. Both during the study of the baseline and at the seminars, dialogues and…