Search Results:
Czech Republic
Pillar III. Access to Remedy Extrajudicial non-state resources [pages 42-43] The Czech Republic acknowledges the benefits and advantages of alternative dispute resolution. Alternative dispute resolution is often faster, cheaper, less formal and more accessible to the parties. As the parties to a dispute are apt to accept an amicable solution better than an authoritative ruling,…
Czech Republic
Pillar III. Access to Remedy Extrajudicial state resources [pages 42-43] Other state bodies may also provide means of redress. These include both subsequent and preventive means. Provisional protection permits various activities that may constitute a risk, in particular industrial operations with a major impact on the surrounding area. The public is entitled to participate in…
Czech Republic
Pillar III. Access to Remedy Judicial resources [pages 41-42] Although there are no fundamental legal obstacles in access to the courts in the Czech Republic, numerous de facto obstructions do exist here. The World Bank’s Doing Business project rates the organisation of the courts and the quality of decision-making in the Czech Republic very highly,…
Czech Republic
Pillar III. Access to Remedy Representation in court, legal assistance [pages 44-46] Judicial proceedings assessing matters of business and human rights can often be very complex and convoluted. Furthermore, the victims in these disputes tend to be the economically or de facto weaker party (consumers, employees members of minorities, etc.) unable to afford decent legal…
Czech Republic
Pillar II. The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Removing the effects of loss or damage [pages 36-37] The Government of the Czech Republic recommends that businesses who, even if only hypothetically, could encounter human rights risk should have procedures in place in case their operations cause human rights loss. The aim should be to find a…
Czech Republic
Pillar I. The State Duty to Protect Non-financial reporting [pages 21-22] Implements Principle 3d Reporting on the activities of large companies works to the benefit not only of business partners and shareholders, but also other stakeholders. With this in mind, companies are increasingly reporting not only on their financial position, but so on the non-financial…
Czech Republic
Pillar II. The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Transparent consultation of matters of general interest [page 39] If a business is preparing a major project that could be linked – even if only potentially – with human rights risks, open communication with all stakeholder groups is recommended. Negotiations should be guided by the following principles: They…
Czech Republic
Pillar II. The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Due Diligence [pages 35-36] The Government of the Czech Republic recommends that businesses consider introducing an internal due diligence mechanism to spot and eliminate human rights risks, or incorporate human rights risks – as another evaluation criterion – into their existing due diligence mechanisms. The term “due diligence”…
Czech Republic
Pillar II. The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Commitment [pages 32-34] A business faced with risks of human rights violations in its operations should make it publicly clear, in the first place, that it is aware of those risks and is ready to tackle them. This respect for human rights is expressed outwardly by a publicly…
